Originally posted by: zaroonkashaf
They informed the previous DCP of what was going on. It was a complaint and there was nothing illegal about it as Whatsapp complaints are valid too under certain circumstances. The whole point there was that there was already a existing complaint out there which the cops chose to overlook even after he had passed away. So this notion that his family is just blaming Rhea for the heck of it goes out the window when they had already made a complaint four months prior to his passing.
We actually do know. His entire staff was changed. His family and friends were alienated from him. These are all things that are in the public domain now with statements given from the concerned parties. One can choose to ignore and claim we do not know or one can consider them since we are indeed talking about his mental here too....right? These are things that clearly point towards a certain kind of relationship. A lot of toxic relationships have control as a common factor. A partner trying to control you, your environment, your whole ecosystem....doesn't sound all that healthy to me but that's me.
Again...I don't get what the common factor is because there's a literally a legal case that has been filed against Rhea. What you are essentially saying is that just because her husband's family believed she was guilty, that is what is the common factor here? I couldn't disagree more. A FIR has been filed against Rhea. There is a whole chargesheet out there of all she has been accused of. These aren't things that have come out of the thin air. Some of the stuff stated in the chargesheet is very much there in the complaint that was made to the previous DCP of Bandra.
So no it is not about trying to find a scapegoat here. Sushant I believe did commit suicide. I also believe he was struggling with some mental health issue. One can believe all that and still there there is a whole lot of legitimacy in what his family is saying. Because like I said mental health doesn't exist in a vacuum.
As for Rhea being tested unfairly? Lol. I'll agree to disagree on this one and leave it at that. Because I don't want to get into writing another essay here...lol.
Lol @ whatsapp complaint. Let's not live in a utopian world and come back to reality. Please try complaining like that in India, the first thing police will say is come to the police station and give a statement. And this is anywhere in India, not just Mumbai. Being a police officer himself, his brother inlaw knew this very well. He tried to wield his power and influence to get preferential treatment and it was denied. End of story.
But still, it was wrong. I agree, Mumbai police was not taking action. They asked for a formal complaint but did the family didn't go through with it? No. But why? Was their pride more important or saving their son/brother/brother-in-law?
His entire staff changed with or without Sushant's permission? Do we know for sure Sushant objected to this? No, he wasn't of an unsound mind. I remember him giving a great interview where he talked about his entrepreneurial venture with Rhea. It didn't seem like he was not in his full consciousness or something.
But I agree - your argument is valid. But it is one version. There are other versions that could explain those suspicions. I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that Rhea is guilty based on hearsay or a media trial, especially when vested interests are at play.
The family is well within their rights to have suspicions over Rhea and her family, and I support their right to get the matter investigation. But for other people to chip in and cast aspersions on Rhea without any basis? I don't agree with that. I mean you are still free to do that of course, I just cannot subscribe to it.
@Bold: You don't agree Rhea is being treated unfairly. Yeah, it isn't unfair. It is straight up malicious, even if there is a 1% chance that she is innocent. Nothing can excuse such crucification with so much misinformation and lies. But yeah, by the time I came to that line in your post, I am not surprised you disagree with me on that. :-)
0