aditya pancholi why couldn't he become a superstar? - Page 6

Originally posted by: coldbrew

It's really not that hard to solve. I despise the hypocritical status quo of bollywood and she calls them out fair and square. I haven't bothered to dig through her persona beyond that, so the whole "vile, vile, vile" outcry was lost on me.

Out of curiosity, I looked through her other posts, and I simply don't care about her BJP/Islam/Hrithik associations. I don't think her anti_Islam rants are right but Indians/Pakistanis trash each other all the time even in daily conversations, so what she says is actually quite tame compared to what normal indian/pak people say behind closed doors or in their locker room conversations. So it's funny as heck when people here act so offended they can't believe their ears. They're either reacting to Kangna or projecting other issues on her--I'm gonna go with the latter.

Red answers blue. Now go figure. 😆

@ Green : You can go with whatever you want even when facts are staring right into your face. Putting your head into the sand is a choice after all. 😳

But whats problematic is when you project your insanity on to others. Now , that we cant have , can we ? .. 😈

Originally posted by: --Pro.vo.King--

Red answers blue. Now go figure. 😆

@ Green : You can go with whatever you want even when facts are staring right into your face. Putting your head into the sand is a choice after all. 😳

But whats problematic is when you project your insanity on to others. Now , that we cant have , can we ? .. 😈

What's staring at my face is the daily dose of sl*tshaming, deriding and hurling of insults at this woman who is trying to get a point across on social media. They're real issues that plague the industry inside out but no one else talks about it except her.

Just cuz I don't spew vitriol about her every chance I get doesn't mean I agree with everything she does or says. I'm sorry hon, you trying to spoonfeed your hatred as a "sane" outlook on her is not looking good for your objectivity.😆

I used to be his fan . I watched few films of him as a hero . He was outstanding in Saathi . Very likeable in Yaad Rakhegi Dunia and Chor Aur Chaand..he even managed to overshadow SRK in some scenes in Yess Boss. But I think it is his persona, which didn't make him appeal to movie makers, also many actors who started their careers in late 80s and early 90s failed to make it big due to competition. At least he is still there, many disappeared.😲

he was brilliant actor

good actor but wasnt flexible at playing comedy, romance and also dance numbers etc.

my opinion based on some films i have seen.

Too fair for most people's liking.. Plus he had the looks of a typical villain.. He doesn't look convincing as a romantic hero or a crusader for justice.. He doesn't emote well imho

He was a lead in 90s. That time his personality was not known. So, it was not because of personality.

It is said, Indians are biased towards fairness. But in reality, a person who is too fair does not get accepted as easily as a brown person, even in entertainment industry. (Neil Nitin Mukhesh v/s Ranveer, Aditya Pancholi v/s Sharukh).
Did anyone feel even for a minute that Aditya Pancholi overshadowed Sharukh in Yes Boss? Most don’t consider Kangana as beautiful. They prefer, Deepika/Sonam.

One need to have Aura / X factor along with talent to become superstar in Bollywood.

I think he could play romantic role, he did well in yaad rakhi duniya, but he was better in womaniser role, also he had the voice and anger to play angry young man role. He was fare but not extremely pale white like niel nittin mukesh, and far better looking than niel nitin mukesh, it’s his bad temper and attitude destroyed his career as a lead hero.

Originally posted by: sarasingh7

One need to have Aura / X factor along with talent to become superstar in Bollywood.

Not at all, if non actors like salman can become superstar or Katrina than anyone can, yes charisma is important