Originally posted by: BinKuchKahe.
When will these people understand? Nepotism isn't the issue. Talentless star kids who are given preference over talented actors is the issue. Talentless star kids whose way is paved by eliminating others who might pose a threat, by way of underhand tactics, is an issue.
These articles really emphasise how stupid BW actors are, and how freaking smart Sushant was.
Who decides who is talented and who is talentless? or how do we decide that? This is not a universal thing . Its personal opinion. Though i agree with you but this a statement is very generic and hence depends on the definition of talent which is very subjective
Some may think Karthik Aryan is more talented than Ranbir and hence Ranbir getting big budget films over Karthik is unfair
Some may say no Ranbir is genuinely more talented hence he deserves these movies
For some Shradhha very talented and for some she is talentless star kid getting several opportunities
Same for Alia some think she is untalented and for some she is talented and hence she deserves her success
I mean the only universal metric can be box office success. If audience decides to watch an insider's movies again and again and not one but several of his/ her movies are a hit and outsider doesn't get the same doesn't it automatically mean that insider is more talented as he or she is able to bring in the audience? For example Alia, she has hardly had any flops most of her movies are hit or semi hit. She has been able to pull in the audience . So is she an untalented star kid? I mean definition of talent can be different for everyone. It means as long as one views the star kid as talented there is no issues if they are getting opportunity again and again which outsiders don't? It doesn't matter how they got their first movie or how they get their other moves easily as long as they are deemed to be talented?
Edited by Sabhayata - 5 years ago
52