Kangana to be summoned in Sushant's case - Page 4

Originally posted by: tapori

I think I fundamentally disagree with you in this.

Kangana's manager has NO bearing to aam jantaa.

Nepotism in movies HAS a bearing not just to aam jantaa, but ALSO to deserving outsiders.

There is no such thing as a "deserving" person, either outsider or insider. Nobody is owed someone else's money. There is absolutely no requirement that anyone has to give movies to anyone. People have every right in the world to choose who they want to work with. It cannot be dictated by anyone else.

She knew he was depressed

She’s liable ❤️

Originally posted by: tapori

I think I fundamentally disagree with you in this.

Kangana's manager has NO bearing to aam jantaa.

Nepotism in movies HAS a bearing not just to aam jantaa, but ALSO to deserving outsiders.

OK so if it doesn't affect you ....u will be fine even if u consider it wrong in principle....koi naa....sabka apna apna perspective hota hai...👍🏼chalo lets agree to disagree on this.

ALSO...just because Kangu decided to hire her sister and also her brother ....MAY BE.....I am saying may be two more deserving people lost a chance to that job.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

OK so if it doesn't affect you ....u will be fine even if u consider it wrong in principle....koi naa....sabka apna apna perspective hota hai...👍🏼chalo lets agree to disagree on this.

ALSO...just because Kangu decided to hire her sister and also her brother ....MAY BE.....I am saying may be two more deserving people lost a chance to that job.

True but I think anyone in the planet dodged a bullet not working for Kangana 😆

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

There is no such thing as a "deserving" person, either outsider or insider. Nobody is owed someone else's money. There is absolutely no requirement that anyone has to give movies to anyone. People have every right in the world to choose who they want to work with. It cannot be dictated by anyone else.

Just like a popular outsider can say NO to work with a new director or a new actress....because they are not sure if the new people would be doing a good job...and make a good movie.....nothing wrong in that either....every single one of us the right to look after ourselves and what is the best for us.

What was the electronics in bathtub joke about?

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

There is no such thing as a "deserving" person, either outsider or insider. Nobody is owed someone else's money. There is absolutely no requirement that anyone has to give movies to anyone. People have every right in the world to choose who they want to work with. It cannot be dictated by anyone else.

In that case I'd - metaphorically - drop the word deserving from my post.

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

OK so if it doesn't affect you ....u will be fine even if u consider it wrong in principle....koi naa....sabka apna apna perspective hota hai...👍🏼chalo lets agree to disagree on this.

ALSO...just because Kangu decided to hire her sister and also her brother ....MAY BE.....I am saying may be two more deserving people lost a chance to that job.

I, as an aam Bollywood audience member & Bollywood lover, don't consider that wrong in principle. I would if it were to impact me, as aam jantaa sanima premi.

Do logon ki shaamat aane se bachi 😆