Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 6 - Page 112

Human tendency to believe God has been universal, resulting in deities all around the world. Every religion has had such God figures from prehistoric era, not just India.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Well as I said that belief of someone isn't challengeable, but by physical laws of nature the things aren't possible.

Every region considers their religion as oldest and original but that isn't the case. Mesopotamian gods like Taimat n Adishoor have no Indian equivalents, Zues/Jupiter might be called Greek-Roman for Dyaus Pitra +Indra but other deities like Aphrodite, etc. have no Indian equivalents.

Coming to Parashuram n Kripacharya they could not save from Invasions happening, but why didn't they atleast save the temples from falling, the libraries n books being burnt and the innocents being killed to make skull towers? These didn't do any problem

And I didn't ask God to correct but Kripacharya n Parashuram to train us theydidn't even do that.

@ preet

Do u really think people would had listen to them , when people were no ready to listen chanakya & not ready 2 unite .

Now one can teach anyone deshbhakti or train to protect ur own country . How can parshuram or kripacharya make anyone train anyone deshbhakti ? Or responsibility towards ur country ?

Dhanand insulted chanayaka instead of listening him , do u think he would had paid attention to parshuram or kripacharya infact he wout had made fun of them also. Indian kings were not saint there were many dhanand present that time.

Train karne se pehle kissi ki baat suna aur samajhna zaruri hota hai . Chandragupta was trained by chanakya coz he listen & realised what chanakya was trying to say , that's d reason he became successful , able to unite india .

Parshuram is guru of karn acc 2 him he gave karn best education , I don't think he ever taught karn anything wrong but still karn chooses to do all wrong things after being trained by best guru . I fail to understand what he learned from parshuram.

There is no guarantee thing would had changed if parshuram or kripacharya would trained us .

Parsuram , kripacharya their own life journey is over , they r waiting to welcome d new yug.

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Ye bhi Drau ne hi kiya hoga.. So we have Prativindya from Mushy & Drau social distancing pavitra rishta🤣🤣

even with blushy drau ne hi kiya hoga thus we have shrutakarma from blushy and drau social distancing and pavitra rishta🤣🤣

yeh mushy and blushy are useless in love bhim se seekho how to be passionate n intense🤣

Originally posted by: HearMeRoar

Human tendency to believe God has been universal, resulting in deities all around the world. Every religion has had such God figures from prehistoric era, not just India.

Archaeologists think that not just humans but even Homo Erectus had some sort of religious beliefs

Neanderthals definitely had some kind of religious burial system.

So Indians are definitely not the oldest

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

@ preet

Do u really think people would had listen to them , when people were no ready to listen chanakya & not ready 2 unite .

Now one can teach anyone deshbhakti or train to protect ur own country . How can parshuram or kripacharya make anyone train anyone deshbhakti ? Or responsibility towards ur country ?

Dhanand insulted chanayaka instead of listening him , do u think he would had paid attention to parshuram or kripacharya infact he wout had made fun of them also. Indian kings were not saint there were many dhanand present that time.

Train karne se pehle kissi ki baat suna aur samajhna zaruri hota hai . Chandragupta was trained by chanakya coz he listen & realised what chanakya was trying to say , that's d reason he became successful , able to unite india .

Parshuram is guru of karn acc 2 him he gave karn best education , I don't think he ever taught karn anything wrong but still karn chooses to do all wrong things after being trained by best guru . I fail to understand what he learned from parshuram.

There is no guarantee thing would had changed if parshuram or kripacharya would trained us .

Parsuram , kripacharya their own life journey is over , they r waiting to welcome d new yug.

So they would leave our men to be killed? Culture to diminish? Books be burnt? Girls be sold for 1 dinar near towers? Temples like Ramjanmasthan, KrishnaJanamsthan, Kashi Vishwanath, Somnath etc to be broken?

See there could be only three reasons for them not to stop it

1) They weren't capable-- Makes no sense if they were so Good warriors of their time and had divine weapons

2) They didn't want to -- I don't think anyone who didn't want to stop it could be called moral, whatever justification one gives. And if they have to only be used at end of times, why keep them on earth for so long? Just get them back when needed!!

3) They don't exist

The brutality that Indians faced between 1200-1600 is among the most brutal genocide example in the world

Hindu Kush mountain is called so because it was around that area most Hindu slaves that those invaders took with them perished

If really they were here and didn't save us back then, then I would prefer they weren't here

Parashuram taught Archery to Karna, he didn't give morality lessons to him, anyhow why did Parashuram hide, he should have at least continued his archery training school

Anyhow this is a discussion between beliefs and rationality, and can actually have no results

Blushy & Mushy ka yarana..

https://www.instagram.com/p/CBQacXdHf14/?igshid=9mn82kgt3eti

Parashuram taught Archery to Karna, he didn't give morality lessons to him, anyhow why did Parashuram hide, he should have at least continued his archery training school

^^ In BRC MB there is a scene when Krishna and Balram are about to graduate from their gurukul, Parshuram comes and gives the sudarshan chakra to Krishna. Parshuram shares how he stayed away from active life after Ram was incarnated knowing that dharma will reign. Maybe age & circumstances were the reason?

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

So they would leave our men to be killed? Culture to diminish? Books be burnt? Girls be sold for 1 dinar near towers? Temples like Ramjanmasthan, KrishnaJanamsthan, Kashi Vishwanath, Somnath etc to be broken?

See there could be only three reasons for them not to stop it

1) They weren't capable-- Makes no sense if they were so Good warriors of their time and had divine weapons

2) They didn't want to -- I don't think anyone who didn't want to stop it could be called moral, whatever justification one gives. And if they have to only be used at end of times, why keep them on earth for so long? Just get them back when needed!!

3) They don't exist

The brutality that Indians faced between 1200-1600 is among the most brutal genocide example in the world

Hindu Kush mountain is called so because it was around that area most Hindu slaves that those invaders took with them perished

If really they were here and didn't save us back then, then I would prefer they weren't here

Parashuram taught Archery to Karna, he didn't give morality lessons to him, anyhow why did Parashuram hide, he should have at least continued his archery training school

Anyhow this is a discussion between beliefs and rationality, and can actually have no results

I m also asking why should they protect .

Did anyone came to help him or assist him ?

He himself searched 4 ways 4 his problems .

Can u tell me where it is written parshuram took responsibility f whole human race , he will protect them or guide them . I don't think parshuram took any oath of protecting human race & making things correct 4 them .

It was indian kings responsibility to protect their subjects not parshuram

I m sorry u r blaming parshuram of something which he is not responsible then why should he protect . Parshuram to dwapar main bhi the still he dint do anything in dwapar 2 stop mahabharat neither he participated .

Now blame him 4 draupadi insult also .

Sabko bachane ki kasam nhi khayi parshuram .

Ghandhari blamed krishna was entire thing without realising her own sons were wrong not krishna .

Krishna was not responsible 4 pandav kaursv rivalry , why should he mend ways 4 them .

Krishna was not responsible 4 war , without any reason got blamed & cursed.

When krishna was not responsible why should he mend things 4 others.

Ur blame on parshuram is point less .

Parshuram dint hided , he retired from wordly duties after ram & Krishna avtar.

Sab kaam parshuram karenge to baaki ki kya karenge.

Ganga requested him to teach devrat / bheesam . Parshuram was not against kshatriya caste but was against who mis use their power .

Parshuram only teach brahman, that's why he was angry on karn & cursed him coz karn lied.

We can agree to disagree

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Parashuram taught Archery to Karna, he didn't give morality lessons to him, anyhow why did Parashuram hide, he should have at least continued his archery training school

^^ In BRC MB there is a scene when Krishna and Balram are about to graduate from their gurukul, Parshuram comes and gives the sudarshan chakra to Krishna. Parshuram shares how he stayed away from active life after Ram was incarnated knowing that dharma will reign. Maybe age & circumstances were the reason?

Parshuram had retired himself from wordly duties , he hardly did anything in tretayug & dwapar also .

He has not taken any oath to make things correct 4 every one.

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Blushy & Mushy ka yarana..

https://www.instagram.com/p/CBQacXdHf14/?igshid=9mn82kgt3eti

Their friendship bond is very strong!! God bless their friendship 🙏