Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 6 - Page 86

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

35.5k

Users

17

Likes

1.1k

Frequent Posters

AninditaB thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

We had a huge discussion in other thread, if Krishna deliberately didn't save the massacre that night but couldn't reach on a conclusion. Although I personally believe he might not be a planner of the massacre but he didn't try to avoid it after he got the information, but there are points which suggest the opposite


He may want that someone from Yadu clan to sit in the throne. I mean it was Yadu's right to sit in the throne after Yayati but it was snatched.


So he didn't save them for making someone from Yadu clan to sit in the throne which was rightfully Yadu's

AninditaB thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

In Draupadi serial Draupadi has beautiful scenes with all


DD Kisan one na? I watched them. It really had many beautiful scenes, but the actors and characterization were a put off.

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Why they didn't get to sit on the throne. I am gonna be forever salty about it. My Drau bloodline deserves that throne more than anyone else's.

Still trying to figure it out, but am unable to get an answer. Most probably they distributed the land among all their grandsons but why wasn't the main land given to Prativindhya's son?


I think either Uppandavas were DasiPutra/sons of some lower wives of Pandavas which were adopted by Draupadi so Subhadra's children got precedence or else probably Krishna's planning theory is correct and Parikshit was Krishna's choice

Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

In Draupadi serial Draupadi has beautiful scenes with all

I found the brothers annoying or maybe it was the acting. Mrinal as Drau was lovely.

AninditaB thumbnail
6th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 5 years ago

If they would have added some Pandava-Drau scenes in Star plus Mahabharat, it would have been good to watch and would have been hit too because Pooja and all the Pandava gang had a very good chemistry with each other.


The scene where they had been arrested and Draupadi came there worriedly and the way Pandavas joked around to make her feel good, is still my favourite scene❤️

Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Still trying to figure it out, but am unable to get an answer. Most probably they distributed the land among all their grandsons but why wasn't the main land given to Prativindhya's son?


I think either Uppandavas were DasiPutra/sons of some lower wives of Pandavas which were adopted by Draupadi so Subhadra's children got precedence or else probably Krishna's planning theory is correct and Parikshit was Krishna's choice

It has to be Krishnas theory. Also if the one year rule didn't exist in the epic, the parentage of the kids is also questionable so all ways Abhi's bloodline gets preference

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456


He may want that someone from Yadu clan to sit in the throne. I mean it was Yadu's right to sit in the throne after Yayati but it was snatched.


So he didn't save them for making someone from Yadu clan to sit in the throne which was rightfully Yadu's

It wasn't Yadu's right, it was completely Yayati's right to decide which land he gives to which son


Aside Yayati wasn't the king of Hastinapur area, most probably he would have been somewhere around modern day Sindh(Around Sindhu River) his progeny spread across the country.


Puru's descandent Bharat became a Samrat and most probably then their direct line shifted the base to Hastinapur, and again now there were multiple kings, so Hastinapur's throne wasn't something to do with Yadu n Yayati

Armu4eva thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Andy3456

If they would have added some Pandava-Drau scenes in Star plus Mahabharat, it would have been good to watch and would have been hit too because Pooja and all the Pandava gang had a very good chemistry with each other.


The scene where they had been arrested and Draupadi came there worriedly and the way Pandavas joked around to make her feel good, is still my favourite scene❤️

Yh and all the consultation in Pandavs discussion Hall in Hastinapur showed how good Poojas chemistry is with all 5

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 5 years ago

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

It has to be Krishnas theory. Also if the one year rule didn't exist in the epic, the parentage of the kids is also questionable so all ways Abhi's bloodline gets preference

not difficult to decide the parentage if person is cautious enough every month n time

Even if parent isn't known



Waise if that comforts you. As per Vayu Puran, Vajra who was given the Kingdom of Indraprasth and/or Mathura was the son of Bhanu(Krishna Satyabhama son) and Suthanu (Yudhishtir Draupadi daughter)

vinnas thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 5 years ago

Today SP edited Dury Animated Bone breaking Scene😲😛

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".