Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 6 - Page 85

Originally posted by: Mages

mohit had amazing chemistry with both mouni and sonarika❤️...i watch till sonarika played parvati and adishakti

the romantic moments b/w shiv-sati and shiv-parvati was so beautiful

I used to be a hardcore Mohit-Mouni fan so I never warmed to Sonarika as Parvati. I stopped watching midway. Then watched entire MK coz I totally loved Pooja and SRJ together.

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Actually I think it's due to the polyandry part. There can be no other logical reason. Even Ramanand Sagar Ramayan have Ram-Sita sweet eyelocks and romantic moments.. The way Ram called Sita "Sitee"

May be. People may find awkward to see romance between only one Pandava or it would have been problem to adjust the romantic moments between all brothers.

Still, they could have showed her sons after 13 years of Arjun's exile.

Originally posted by: Mages

Prativindhya...

Yes. I also think, why he was not married. I mean by the time of war, he would have already been of marriageable age.

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Actually I think it's due to the polyandry part. There can be no other logical reason. Even Ramanand Sagar Ramayan have Ram-Sita sweet eyelocks and romantic moments.. The way Ram called Sita "Sitee"

but isn't easy to show romance in polyandry?

she is wife of 5 pandavas and they have equal rights on draupadi

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

I used to be a hardcore Mohit-Mouni fan so I never warmed to Sonarika as Parvati. I stopped watching midway. Then watched entire MK coz I totally loved Pooja and SRJ together.

I love both pooja and sonarika as parvati❤

srj is good as lord shiva since mohit is so attached to me as lord shiva i could not warm up to him as lord shiva...

i see srj face when i worship krishna its the same i see mohit face when i worship shiva...the image could not be replace in my mind and heart

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Yes. I also think, why he was not married. I mean by the time of war, he would have already been of marriageable age.

He and other Uppandavas most probably had sons

Originally posted by: Mages

but isn't easy to show romance in polyandry?

she is wife of 5 pandavas and they have equal rights on draupadi

Yh but u know how our country is patriarchal. The thought of woman with more than one man is so much taboo. That's why they had to manage with eyelocks. Hats off to Pooja and all the Pandavs. They created lovely chemistry with her.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

He and other Uppandavas most probably had sons

Why they didn't get to sit on the throne. I am gonna be forever salty about it. My Drau bloodline deserves that throne more than anyone else's.

Originally posted by: Mages

i felt krishna was not fair here...he could have save upapandavas

We had a huge discussion in other thread, if Krishna deliberately didn't save the massacre that night but couldn't reach on a conclusion. Although I personally believe he might not be a planner of the massacre but he didn't try to avoid it after he got the information, but there are points which suggest the opposite

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Yh but u know how our country is patriarchal. The thought of woman with more than one man is so much taboo. That's why they had to manage with eyelocks. Hats off to Pooja and all the Pandavs. They created lovely chemistry with her.

In Draupadi serial Draupadi has beautiful scenes with all