Originally posted by: naq5
well everyone celebrated when the hyderabad case rapists were planned encountered by police. That was also a planned killing without the judiciary taking its due course. we still wouldnt know if more people were involved or not because everyone involved is dead. The whole countries conscience dint think that law dint actually take its course tht time. That is because people have no sympathies for rapists and molesters
there is a difference between a potential rapist/molester and a person. i have no sympathies for potential rapists. We need to know what Abir knew when he left the person to die(did he know that he tried to molest mishti or he left a random person to die.). Another thing if was he already dead by the time Abir reached there.
Also there is a difference between spiking an innocents drink and getting him sick vs killing in self defense. if Abir thought what nanko did is a crime even then he did not report him or meenu to the police. here what mishti did is not a crime.
Yes there would have been better way of handling the situation. Maybe Abir should have just stayed n told that i found two people unconscious. The blame could have gone on 3rd person. How would anyone prove it was mishti who hit with brick, unless there as eyewitness or cctv there