Posted:
The dog represents Dharm. Isnt that a metaphor? Plus given how he has spent his whole life upholding his (twisted) version of Dharm and put it above all, his end seems quite right.
SHOCK & GUILT 16.1
CASE REOPEN 17.1
🏏WPL 2026, Match-9, RCB W vs GG W. Dr DY Patil Stadium. Navi Mumbai🏏
Are Dhanush And Mrunal Thakur Getting Married????
The Wait (Ariya FF) New Thread Part-82 Updated( page-1)
🏏WPL 2026, Match-10, UPW W vs MI W. Dr DY Patil Stadium. Navi Mumbai
Chhaava Is A Divisive Film - A R Rehman
🏏WPL 2026, Match-11, DC W vs RCB W, DY Patil Stadium. Navi Mumbai 🏏
Two genuinely good films from 2025 that deserved better
Why are BW actors going crazy posting 2016 posts?
Ranveer personally got Kalyani onboard for Pralay
Happy Birthday Siddharth Malhotra 💖🎂🎊
Spirit Release Date Locked
The dog represents Dharm. Isnt that a metaphor? Plus given how he has spent his whole life upholding his (twisted) version of Dharm and put it above all, his end seems quite right.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
Actually, everything after the mongoose incident in Ashwamedhika Parva is considered later interpolation.
Has BORI removed it all?
Originally posted by: Armu4eva
The dog represents Dharm. Isnt that a metaphor? Plus given how he has spent his whole life upholding his (twisted) version of Dharm and put it above all, his end seems quite right.
Yeah. Probably.
What I meant is dog wasn't literally his papa.
Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
Has BORI removed it all?
No. Because it's there in most MSs. Thought is since mongoose was a buddhist symbol, that and all the rest were put in place by later writers... before written versions came into being.
One of the pieces of evidence being the wildly differing endings in other versions and even Bhagavatham and puranas.
As I said before, Tharu version ends with everyone simply leaving. Panchali goes home to her Agni family.
Bhagavatham has Krishna disappearing with only Arjuna as witness. I'm guessing Krishna just had it with Aryavarta by then. Yudhishtira just abdicates. Pandavas leave the land. Panchali and Subhadra die in the palace.
Devi Purana says Krishna leaves in front of everyone. Er... Panchali leaves with him. Pandavas return to their respective fathers. Arjuna goes to Vaikuntha since he is Vishnu here.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
No. Because it's there in most MSs. Thought is since mongoose was a buddhist symbol, that and all the rest were put in place by later writers... before written versions came into being.
One of the pieces of evidence being the wildly differing endings in other versions and even Bhagavatham and puranas.
As I said before, Tharu version ends with everyone simply leaving. Panchali goes home to her Agni family.
Bhagavatham has Krishna disappearing with only Arjuna as witness. I'm guessing Krishna just had it with Aryavarta by then. Yudhishtira just abdicates. Pandavas leave the land. Panchali and Subhadra die in the palace.
Devi Purana says Krishna leaves in front of everyone. Er... Panchali leaves with him. Pandavas return to their respective fathers. Arjuna goes to Vaikuntha since he is Vishnu here.
Well even if this version and instances were from day 1, it could still not be considered an Itihaas, this would at max be an idea of Vaishampayan.
Anyhow all the other versions given are actually post Mahabharata, so I am not sure if we could actually believe in them, yet I really hope that the Nepali version you said is true, in all the others Yudhishtir gets a happy ending something I hate.
Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
Well even if this version and instances were from day 1, it could still not be considered an Itihaas, this would at max be an idea of Vaishampayan.
Anyhow all the other versions given are actually post Mahabharata, so I am not sure if we could actually believe in them, yet I really hope that the Nepali version you said is true, in all the others Yudhishtir gets a happy ending something I hate.
@bold i have this sadist pleasure to see him tortured to death😡🤮
Naagin 7
Real Estate
