Posted:
The dog represents Dharm. Isnt that a metaphor? Plus given how he has spent his whole life upholding his (twisted) version of Dharm and put it above all, his end seems quite right.
🏏IPL 2026:Royal Challengers Bengaluru vs Gujarat Titans, Final🏏
Kickoff Legends: FIFA World Cup 2026 Prediction Game (Sign up Open)
Ranveer Singh at UEFA (PSG vs Arsenal match)
Episode dtd 31.5
Kyunki To Get Another Spinoff
13 years of Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani
How cbse rewrote rules to favor coempt eduteck
The dog represents Dharm. Isnt that a metaphor? Plus given how he has spent his whole life upholding his (twisted) version of Dharm and put it above all, his end seems quite right.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
Actually, everything after the mongoose incident in Ashwamedhika Parva is considered later interpolation.
Has BORI removed it all?
Originally posted by: Armu4eva
The dog represents Dharm. Isnt that a metaphor? Plus given how he has spent his whole life upholding his (twisted) version of Dharm and put it above all, his end seems quite right.
Yeah. Probably.
What I meant is dog wasn't literally his papa.
Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
Has BORI removed it all?
No. Because it's there in most MSs. Thought is since mongoose was a buddhist symbol, that and all the rest were put in place by later writers... before written versions came into being.
One of the pieces of evidence being the wildly differing endings in other versions and even Bhagavatham and puranas.
As I said before, Tharu version ends with everyone simply leaving. Panchali goes home to her Agni family.
Bhagavatham has Krishna disappearing with only Arjuna as witness. I'm guessing Krishna just had it with Aryavarta by then. Yudhishtira just abdicates. Pandavas leave the land. Panchali and Subhadra die in the palace.
Devi Purana says Krishna leaves in front of everyone. Er... Panchali leaves with him. Pandavas return to their respective fathers. Arjuna goes to Vaikuntha since he is Vishnu here.
Originally posted by: HearMeRoar
No. Because it's there in most MSs. Thought is since mongoose was a buddhist symbol, that and all the rest were put in place by later writers... before written versions came into being.
One of the pieces of evidence being the wildly differing endings in other versions and even Bhagavatham and puranas.
As I said before, Tharu version ends with everyone simply leaving. Panchali goes home to her Agni family.
Bhagavatham has Krishna disappearing with only Arjuna as witness. I'm guessing Krishna just had it with Aryavarta by then. Yudhishtira just abdicates. Pandavas leave the land. Panchali and Subhadra die in the palace.
Devi Purana says Krishna leaves in front of everyone. Er... Panchali leaves with him. Pandavas return to their respective fathers. Arjuna goes to Vaikuntha since he is Vishnu here.
Well even if this version and instances were from day 1, it could still not be considered an Itihaas, this would at max be an idea of Vaishampayan.
Anyhow all the other versions given are actually post Mahabharata, so I am not sure if we could actually believe in them, yet I really hope that the Nepali version you said is true, in all the others Yudhishtir gets a happy ending something I hate.
Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism
Well even if this version and instances were from day 1, it could still not be considered an Itihaas, this would at max be an idea of Vaishampayan.
Anyhow all the other versions given are actually post Mahabharata, so I am not sure if we could actually believe in them, yet I really hope that the Nepali version you said is true, in all the others Yudhishtir gets a happy ending something I hate.
@bold i have this sadist pleasure to see him tortured to death😡🤮
Cricket
Seher Hone Ko Hai
