OUTSIDERs vs INSIDERs - A Viewpoint on Films Done & Failures - Page 7

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

When this happens then the actors/actresses start shifting blame to nepotism. 😆😆

He isn’t publicised too well imo.

Originally posted by: Renee.Clare

Because he is talented in my opinion. And which audience you are talking about I like him, and, I know, if he does get good scripts (.i admit his choices have been horrible lately) he might do well. Please stop generalising audience , me and many of my friends do like him. So, it's like this.

That's great that you are watching him but I was just talking about the general audience at large. This is all a money game. If his films are successes, he will get the hype. Just like Kartik or Ayushmann.

Originally posted by: sweetshruti

For every Ranbir, Alia, Sonam, Abhishek, Hrithik, Salman, Tushar Kapoor, Uday Chopra, Esha Deol, Bobby Deol, Kareena, Karishma, Tiger, Varun, Kajol, Rani, Sanjay Dutt, Aamir Khan, Imran Khan, Ajay Devgan, Arjun Kapoor, Sanjay Kapoor, Jhanvi, Ananya, Sara etc etc

There is also RKR, SSR, Kriti Sanon, Aishwariya Rai, Priyanka Chopra, Sushmita Sen, Akshay Kumar, SRK, Govinda, Sunil Shetty, Preity Zinta, Katrina Kaif, Anushka Sharma, Ranveer Singh, Deepika Padukone, Kangana Ranaut, Juhi Chawla, Raveena Tandon, Jacqueline, Siddharth Malhotra, Ayushman Khurana. Bhumi, Tapsee , Manisha Koirala, Amitabh Bachchan, Dharmendra, Hema Malini, Rekha, Kartik Aryan etc etc

Each one of the people mentioned above have had failures and have gotten work in spite of those failures. In fact while creating this list it almost made me think that there are more successful outsiders than insiders in the industry.

Which proves one thing for sure despite Nepotism in Film Industry, it has given work/promoted/supported OUTSIDERs more in their FAILUREs then they have done to their own KIDs.

Originally posted by: HugeScarcity

That's great that you are watching him but I was just talking about the general audience at large. This is all a money game. If his films are successes, he will get the hype. Just like Kartik or Ayushmann.

To be honest, I don't go with general audience I don't care about hype and all. I make my own choices and there is certain audience always for some kind of movies and actors.

We all have our individual choices, though I got emotional with Sushant's death but ,I am not going to force people to leave watching things they like. I am already done with all this. If they want to do something by heart, they should, otherwise it's of no use.

Talking about the hype, that's also very personal choice, if I compare him with less talented actors, he deserves more hype but that depends with whom I am comparing him with. I have accepted that he had made some horrible choices lately.

I am done. I can't debate more on this. I did a mistake entering into this thread. I have been going through so much negativity in this forum that I am done now.

Thanks 😆

Someone as mediocre as Tushar doing 20 films is all you need to know 😆

Akshay was a lucky one who was great in action with his martial arts background something rarely seen in 90s in Bollywood and perhaps the reason why he got that much movies . Waise he also has links up with Sajid nadiadwala since 90s so that wouldve helped.

Originally posted by: bakhtaavar

Someone as mediocre as Tushar doing 20 films is all you need to know 😆

Akshay was a lucky one who was great in action with his martial arts background something rarely seen in 90s in Bollywood and perhaps the reason why he got that much movies . Waise he also has links up with Sajid nadiadwala since 90s so that wouldve helped.

They why were his films failed back to back if he was good in action or ppl to want to see Martial Arts in films which were rare? This should have boasted his success ratio, all we see as he was giving flop back to back, yet ppl were seeing him in new films even after that.

Originally posted by: Radhe2712

They why were his films failed back to back if he was good in action or ppl to want to see Martial Arts in films which were rare? This should have boasted his success ratio, all we see as he was giving flop back to back, yet ppl were seeing him in new films even after that.

Arman kohli , son of a producer , couldn't make it because none of his earliest films worked.

Originally posted by: bakhtaavar

I think it was from 96 to 2003 when he had 0 hits and huge no of flops , he was lucky that he had established himself by then as one of the most popular action heroes with khiladi series , mohra , suhaag and other 2 hero films . I think if he had given those 10-15 flops in the start he would've found it tough to come back.

Arman kohli , son of a producer , couldn't make it because none of his earliest films worked.

He has done films back to back, signed in Quantity, even not realizing this that he should at least make them success or they should earn profits for investor, ignoring the fact that due to doing films in Quantity they were failures at box office. In 1994, he had 11 releases, 1 saal mein itni filmein, still ppl cry for star kids doing films.

Originally posted by: Radhe2712

He has done films back to back, signed in Quantity, even not realizing this that he should at least make them success or they should earn profits for investor, ignoring the fact that due to doing films in Quantity they were failures at box office. In 1994, he had 11 releases, 1 saal mein itni filmein, still ppl cry for star kids doing films.

Originally posted by: bakhtaavar

I saw one of his interviews with sajid nadiadwala where he said they are friends since he entered in Bollywood , definitely he wouldve got some help from him even then when he was a flop .

Sajid & Akki are School mates, yes he knew him well, but he wasn't that big producer when Akki was giving Flop in rows.