IF reaction - Page 7

Originally posted by: Radhe2712

As I said it was highlighted by that big fight with Ranbir, where they exposed him. The industry might be reading their stuff, but it doesn't count as MEDIA. MEDIA reach is far bigger than them.

I am reading about Blinds mainly online-only, hardly anyone in real life or audience interested in films bothered about them.

I meant industry people only read...Katrina one I remember watching...it was a solo IV...she clearly mentioned blinds are read...even comments. On Twitter I have seen several times different bolly journos and creative ppl share Mumbai Mirror tailpieces and Masand's blinds and asking ppl to decipher.

That's how different perceptions are created. That's what was used against Sushant to damage his professional image .

Originally posted by: rkisnothot

Pinkvilla has always been trash. No doubt blinds were planted against Sushant calling him arrogant and jobless by people in BW earlier and now they're backtracking because they know the public will blame the industry. Blinds have become part and parcel of BW in the last 10 years. Everyone is always planting garbage against each other. Not just blinds but full on articles too.

They get full help from fans who give momentum to blinds about their rivals. Everyone loves gossip when it's not about their favorites. Even this week, I saw rival fans of celebrities taking advantage of this situation to increase the negativity towards their favorite's rivals.

We are all at fault.

Blinds on others were fun for me and blinds on my favs sad to read.

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

In the blinds case. We should have known better. The idea was to let women speak up comfortably. There was no way to prove Rajiv got that news from the woman. And when the women herself clarified within three weeks. That was the woman speaking up and we should have listened to her. Not to say woman don't falsely accuse. But it would take a lot for woman to take on the title of rape victim for false accusation. There is a stigma attached and it is usually worse if not still very bad for the woman having been raped than it is for the man. In some parts of rural India they won't be able to get married.

I did read you comment there. You said you were shocked about how someone as well educated like Sushant could do that. You used terms like "If it is true" and didn't take it for face value. But we were all mislead by the campaign to some extent.

I am wondering if I ever bashed him after that. I don't think I did. But I should have commented on the Chichore thread. People were making fun of his makeup. I thought the acting was brilliant besides the makeup and should have voiced that. I watched it to kill time in December when I was on holiday break form school.

Originally posted by: Sailor-Moon

I feel like MeToo was for women to speak comfortably, but people turned it into something terrible like they became jury and court and started calling someone a sexual assaulter without knowing if it's true or false. So we should listen to them but we should also understand that sexual abuse is so awful that calling someone that should be done carefully, I mean I really think everything in this world can be justified to a certain extent but only sexual abuse, child sexual abuse and racism is what I think are the worst things in the world because they can never be justified, there is never any reason to do it, it's only something a narcissist sociopath would do. A person can even have a reason for stealing, if he's starving or something but sexual abuse is just so terrible. So it's super super tricky to just become the judge and call someone a rapist/molester on hearsay because it could be false and people should be neutral but also listen to the woman.

In fact I don't think writing blinds like this were any help to the #metoo movement. Nor were people believing them. Again I wish I had done my research on blinds before I commented. They in fact proved how the #metoo movement can be used as a way to target and harass innocents. It was suppose to be a movement to empower women who were bullied by people like Harvey Weinstein. Who took advantage of their power to bully them. These blinds use the movement to harass a poor powerless guy like Sushant. I am ashamed of myself for being so ignorant to even comment. BUT that doesn't take the blame away from the establishment that tried to create this narrative behind and him. In the process tarnished a movement that was so well intentioned when it first began.

This thread exposed hypocrisy of us BF members. Forget about those blinds, on chhichhore thread too, people were praising and taking the name of Shraddha only, just like Sara in Kedarnath thread. Bottom line is, majority of the people didn't care about Sushant when he was alive.

Originally posted by: grumpydwarf

In fact I don't think writing blinds like this were any help to the #metoo movement. Nor were people believing them. Again I wish I had done my research on blinds before I commented. They in fact proved how the #metoo movement can be used as a way to target and harass innocents. It was suppose to be a movement to empower women who were bullied by people like Harvey Weinstein. Who took advantage of their power to bully them. These blinds use the movement to harass a poor powerless guy like Sushant. I am ashamed of myself for being so ignorant to even comment. BUT that doesn't take the blame away from the establishment that tried to create this narrative behind and him. In the process tarnished a movement that was so well intentioned when it first began.

In Sushant's case it just feels so awful because that girl came out and said it didn't happen yet some people who didn't trust her clarification must have till his death kept calling him a molester and he probably must've kept reading it and feeling so low over it.

Originally posted by: slumgod..

Bottom like is, majority of the people didn't care about Sushant when he was alive.

I know didn’t 🤗🤗

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

I understand, how people are agitated with nepotistic gang, who used to redicule Sushant.

By the way how kind was IF towards Sushant?

Making fun that he is jobless and still boasts

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bollywood/5062162/ssr-says-he-is-in-talks-for-12-films

When blind on Sanjana Sanghi released (12 pages)

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bollywood/5038328/sanjana-sanghi-sexually-molested-then-silenced-by-ssr-and-mukesh-chab

Originally posted by: WexQuasExort

Btw wtf is this? Explain pls

https://www.facebook.com/100036265849517/posts/268484884370371/

I've not seen this movie. Can someone who's watched the movie enlighten us on whether there's a scene like that in the movie?

Originally posted by: BinKuchKahe.

I've not seen this movie. Can someone who's watched the movie enlighten us on whether there's a scene like that in the movie?

No scene like this. But there were strong blind items that these 2 were hooking up if that makes the clip more palatable 😆