Mahabharat Retelecast Discussion Thread 3 - Page 95

Originally posted by: davis56

Where is it mentioned that samba tried to r**e lakshmana ? I never heard about this

Can somebody kindly provide the texts that mentioned this

It is mentioned in Sreemad Bhagwatam.

Saamb abducted Lakshmana just before her Swayamwar and.....

Anyhow Duryodhan and Kauravas reach there at time

arrest Samb.

Krishna gets this news and makes no attempts to help Samb, but Balram is infuriated, he reaches out to Duryodhan asking for immidiate release of Samb else he would destroy Hastinapur.

He also agrees for Lakshmana Samb marriage where Lakshmana would be treated respectfully at their place

Duryodhan gets afraid and complies eventually Lakshmana Samb marriage.

However I think it was that after her abduction, Lakshmana's suitors weren't interested in her and therefore Duryodhan negotiated a respectable marriage for Lakshmana Samb by Balram

Is really Yudhisthir's daughter married to Krishna's son Bhanu?

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Arjun also told Karna - Lagta hai aap mera woh roop bhul nahi paye🤣 I felt like he was lowkey teasing🤣

Yes he was. In this forum someone wrote an OS where Karna says he can do everything Arjun can and he tries to be Vrihannala. It was in good humour and so sweet and funny

Originally posted by: Andy3456

Is really Yudhisthir's daughter married to Krishna's son Bhanu?

Folk tale. Not there in epic

Originally posted by: Andy3456

3rd pic☺️. Itna toh no Pandavas even touched her

Omg this makes me so uncomfortable i still think he is dhrit omg 😭😭

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Sadly Bina kuchh kiye aaj majority logon k liye Karna shrestha ban gaya hai😳

But then this is Kaliyug, Duryodhan was an incarnation of Kali so indirectly ye Duryodhan ka Yug hai to obviously log to uske friend ko hi pasand karenge na

P.S. wonder why no one remembers Shusharma he gave the toughest fight to Arjun

Serials haven't even remembered Satyaki. Yeh sab toh dur ki baat  🤣

No honestly why nobody ever talks of Satyaki

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Yes it reflects on the kind of values Krishna has instilled in Samba. Certainly.

See in this logic all parents are to be blamed for their children's wrong doings. Talking in terms of personality and psychology (have studied psychology for a while), both NATURE and NURTURE plays a very important role in one's personality. For example, look at Karna. Considering he was born of Kunti and with values of Radha and Adhirath he should have been a great guy. He was not.

Not always are the values of the parents stand alone pointer at one's personality. Nurture include alot of other things ie, people around, friends, studies, life events. You can read up about personality anywhere you wish to.

It is technically wrong to say this, had this been a view I would not have argued but Krishna didn't support his deed, no evidence that he ever taught anyone this and he was the opposite of what Samba did as everyone else pointed out. So here it is clear that Samba's evil nature comes from his nature, not his nurture. Even if nurture played a role, it definitely wasn't his parental values.

So we really can't put this on Krishna. As for Kunti is concerned, Adhya gave the needful citation. Unlike shows, Kunti always showed support from Draupadi.

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

Omg this makes me so uncomfortable i still think he is dhrit omg 😭😭

He is Dhrit only.

Bheem in full form🥳

Vikarna dies first from the 100 list?

Originally posted by: Armu4eva

Bheem in full form🥳

Vikarna dies first from the 100 list?

Don't know but it is said that Bheem had difficulty in killing Vikarn because he was not that Adharmi.