:|:Baathein Kuch Unkahe Se:|:YRHPK CC#3; DT Note Pg 108 - Page 23

Originally posted by: The_incredible

Even if he wasn't just a husband and also a king, does that justify his actions..he did take the oath of marrying af the woman only moni .that's y he didn't marry again..I'm sorry I can never support Ram for that action of his.it doesn't make him purushotam..before being the queen of Ayodhya and his wife,Sita was a woman..and no pregnant woman deserves to be treated in that way...

She proved her chastity in fire when he refused to take her back in Lanka..and again he wanted her to do agani pariksha..and there t theories that it wasn't the real sita whom Ravan captured..he had captured the maya sita.

And still he made a mockery of her chastity yaar..that was not fair..

The love between brothers..if the brothers had to live for Ram,y did they even marry..y is that the sufferings of the Sita's sisters was not being addressed...y dont people speak of the sacrifices by urmila..

You know what, Urmila and Hanuman are my favourite characters from Ramayan.

Originally posted by: The_incredible

May be that's true rashi..Arjun would have suppressed his feeling..in one of the incidents in exile ,Arjun devotes all the jewellery he got from indra loka to only Draupadi..there's no mention of subhadra or his other wives. so he would have loved Draupadi more..

Arjuna was guilty ammu. his thought process was that he is the one who brought her to that life. And she is his first wife yaar, so he will have more feelings than others. Atleast 1% more. Even now, a man can marry more than one but first wife will only have all the rights and power.

Originally posted by: Ashi3

You know what, Urmila and Hanuman are my favourite characters from Ramayan.

Yes, Urmila is the true lover I would say. It was said that Lakshman didn't even have the marital life with her. But she still remain as his wife.

Ofcourse you will love Hanuman woh tho saaksaath Lord Shiva hain na.

Originally posted by: Ashi3

Oh yes, I know you mean THAT. 🤣

And what was THAT?🤣

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

Yes, Urmila is the true lover I would say. It was said that Lakshman didn't even have the marital life with her. But she still remain as his wife.

Ofcourse you will love Hanuman woh tho saaksaath Lord Shiva hain na.

Yes, she is the true lover. Her silent love remains forgotten mostly.

And Lord Shiva is my all time favourite!

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

And what was THAT?🤣

THAT is thaaat...🤣 🤣

Originally posted by: The_incredible

Moni I have heard story that Draupadi kept a secret from Pandava and when they were in exile,one day something happened (I'd remember what exactly happened)and Draupadi had to say the thing that she kept hidden .she confessed her love for Karn ..it is a regional story I guess

Ammu,

See that is human nature, I will explain in the context of love okay va.

Draupathi saw karna first and attracted towards him because he is the man she wanted but her and krishna is aware of this. So he diverted her attention to Arjuna who is definitely but she wants 4 qualities more in her man. Then turn of events happened, she married Arjun. If at all she was just married to Arjun only, she wouldn't have thought about her first attraction towards Karna. Then later she got married to 4 men which is very weird in those days. But she sustained and she accustomed her for that life like every other women do until she was defamed for the very same reason. So as human , she would have thought like what if I got married to that man (Karna) who was I attracted too. What if i would have followed by intuition and got married to Karna. Remember Karna is also a one woman man. So all those things happened in her marital life would have pushed the attraction as a love for Karna. Yeah, when you regret your decision about any thing or anyone. It is the love you have for them or for that thing right. And that is what happened with her.

Originally posted by: Ashi3

You know what, Urmila and Hanuman are my favourite characters from Ramayan.

Urmila is my favourite also ashi..she was a forgotten heroine..u know what..in every epic,it was women who suffered..in Ramayan the number of suffered women is cohntless yaar..the entire Raghu clan was indifferent to the feelings of women..I'm not a feminist..but the way epics r written..u will feel that ...

In Mahabharat ,draupadi got humiliated in a sabha...how would have she felt yaar...what would have been her condition..she overcame that incident...nad u can't blame Pandavas also for that...they were helpless ...they couldn't do anything..😭😭

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

Abandoning your wife pregnant or not, is wrong. He know he is at fault but helpless. He should have explained her the situation like he did before the Agni pariksha was asked to perform and wasn't for him it is for the world to prove her chastity. And she happily performed agni pariksha after she read her husband's eyes. When she wasn't giving any explanation and was abandoned in the forest, she didn't get back in his life. This is to show how much communication is important between hubby and wifely. Lakshman know that there is a sage aashram is near by before leaving his bhabhi in the forest.

Ammu, they are all gods and goddess, they came to earth to show the human how should one live and how should one not. Basically, it is for us to learn and not repeat any mistakes they did. Being a Sasthriyaas, they could have married so many other women but didn't. That is another lesson. Likewise there are so many lessons in every mythology.

The whole Ayodhya clan are cursed none of their ladies lived happily not just sita atleast sita was with her husband for 13 years, Urmila was separated from lakshman and bharathan , chatrukan didn't live their matrial life once their brother went to Vanvaash.

Sita herself could have got out of Lanka. She had that power but she wanted her husband to come for her rescue. Even hanuman was ready to rescue but she refused because she want to prove the world and Ravan that true love will do anything and everything.

May be...may be sita happily lived her lyf after she was abandoned..I don't know..I can't just acknowledge Ram as maryada Purushottam as evryone says..love is not above respect yaar..Ram,even though compromised with Sita's self respect..and I as a girl can never respect that just becoz he was a god who incarnated to teach us love..

Ps:the entire Uttar Ramayan was not written by Valmiki..it was written much later..so abandonment of Sita was not there in original epic I guess.

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

Arjuna was guilty ammu. his thought process was that he is the one who brought her to that life. And she is his first wife yaar, so he will have more feelings than others. Atleast 1% more. Even now, a man can marry more than one but first wife will only have all the rights and power.

Moni there's a theory.. Arjuna loved Draupadi as a Pandava and as a husband..but subhadra ,he loved her as himself..we cannot say whom he loved more.i believed it first ,now when I scrutinize mahabharat again..I feel Draupadi was his fav wife..