:|:Baathein Kuch Unkahe Se:|:YRHPK CC#3; DT Note Pg 108 - Page 22

Originally posted by: The_incredible

Kshatriyas r allowed to keep more than one wives yaar..and arjun did exactly that..all those marital relationships in Mahabharat r meant for some or other political purpose .as moni said,through subhadra the entire kuru clan survived..and Draupadi was a instrument in reinstalling dharma in the world..

Krishna played his leelas and Draupadi was meant to be the wife of all Pandavas due to her boon that she got in her last lyf...

Regarding her love for Karna..if she had loved Karna y is she being regarded as one chaste queen..wasnt it wrong in her part to love someone other than the person who u marry???I don't believe in that story..she. Clearly favoured Arjun more...and from the Pandavas side,it was Bheem who loved her the most and who fulfilled her all wishes..

Ammu,

she didn't nurtured her feelings for karna after marriage. She saw him for the first time in her suyamvar. And they spoke through their eyes which is first stage of love called attraction but before even it could develop into love...it was crushed because she got married to another Man. So she was attracted to Karna not infatuation. It is a feeling Ammu. When draupadi was defamed in the court, her eyes will first look at her husbands and then it was directed to Karna because she would have got some sort of feelings right when she saw his eyes. Yes this person will be good inside too. Eyes are the window for your conscience ammu.

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

Yes ru and even uloopi.

How r u feeling now Ru...🤗

better than yday but not completely well...

Originally posted by: ruhi19

moni🤗

better than yday but not completely well...

Ru🤗

good to hear you're better and you'll be more better tomorrow. Take Care.

Look at his caption gals...

https://www.instagram.com/p/B_6z1n9lqak/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

Ammu,

she didn't nurtured her feelings for karna after marriage. She saw him for the first time in her suyamvar. And they spoke through their eyes which is first stage of love called attraction but before even it could develop into love...it was crushed because she got married to another Man. So she was attracted to Karna not infatuation. It is a feeling Ammu. When draupadi was defamed in the court, her eyes will first look at her husbands and then it was directed to Karna because she would have got some sort of feelings right when she saw his eyes. Yes this person will be good inside too. Eyes are the window for your conscience ammu.

Moni I have heard story that Draupadi kept a secret from Pandava and when they were in exile,one day something happened (I'd remember what exactly happened)and Draupadi had to say the thing that she kept hidden .she confessed her love for Karn ..it is a regional story I guess

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

Ru🤗

good to hear you're better and you'll be more better tomorrow. Take Care.

Originally posted by: The_incredible

Moni I have heard story that Draupadi kept a secret from Pandava and when they were in exile,one day something happened (I'd remember what exactly happened)and Draupadi had to say the thing that she kept hidden .she confessed her love for Karn ..it is a regional story I guess

Originally posted by: Npdeepa

Love ka Magic hua hoga🤣

Ramayan is about LOVE....and i meant that😉

Oh yes, I know you mean THAT. 🤣

Originally posted by: Rashi23

Yes many ppl say that all the marriages were bcoz of the political reasons n arjun married all the other princesses so that they can form alliance with them

Ya, bheem loved her the most but arjun due to the sharing of draupadi didn't liked to show more of his feelings to her bcoz he knew that draupadi favoured him the most out of all the brothers n didn't wanted his brothers to feel neglected n dejected

If not krishnas leela mahabharat wudnt have happened

Even I don't believe in karna draupadi ls but has vedvyas written about it? Many say that karna was angry n frustrated that draupadi chosed arjun n got married to five men n hence that day he took out his anger n envy by saying that shes a chaste

May be that's true rashi..Arjun would have suppressed his feeling..in one of the incidents in exile ,Arjun devotes all the jewellery he got from indra loka to only Draupadi..there's no mention of subhadra or his other wives.so he would have loved Draupadi more..

Originally posted by: The_incredible

Even if he wasn't just a husband and also a king, does that justify his actions..he did take the oath of marrying af the woman only moni .that's y he didn't marry again..I'm sorry I can never support Ram for that action of his.it doesn't make him purushotam..before being the queen of Ayodhya and his wife, Sita was a woman..and no pregnant woman deserves to be treated in that way...

She proved her chastity in fire when he refused to take her back in Lanka..and again he wanted her to do agani pariksha..and there t theories that it wasn't the real sita whom Ravan captured..he had captured the maya sita.

And still he made a mockery of her chastity yaar..that was not fair..

The love between brothers..if the brothers had to live for Ram,y did they even marry..y is that the sufferings of the Sita's sisters was not being addressed...y dont people speak of the sacrifices by urmila..

Abandoning your wife pregnant or not, is wrong. He know he is at fault but helpless. He should have explained her the situation like he did before the Agni pariksha was asked to perform and wasn't for him it is for the world to prove her chastity. And she happily performed agni pariksha after she read her husband's eyes. When she wasn't giving any explanation and was abandoned in the forest, she didn't get back in his life. This is to show how much communication is important between hubby and wifely. Lakshman know that there is a sage aashram is near by before leaving his bhabhi in the forest.

Ammu, they are all gods and goddess, they came to earth to show the human how should one live and how should one not. Basically, it is for us to learn and not repeat any mistakes they did. Being a Sasthriyaas, they could have married so many other women but didn't. That is another lesson. Likewise there are so many lessons in every mythology.

The whole Ayodhya clan are cursed none of their ladies lived happily not just sita atleast sita was with her husband for 13 years, Urmila was separated from lakshman and bharathan , chatrukan didn't live their matrial life once their brother went to Vanvaash.

Sita herself could have got out of Lanka. She had that power but she wanted her husband to come for her rescue. Even hanuman was ready to rescue but she refused because she want to prove the world and Ravan that true love will do anything and everything.