Originally posted by: Npdeepa
Never ever I will say that he was protecting his wife. That bit was the most irritating bit for me in Ramayan.
Ramayan is about Love for family, kingdom, siblings, spouse and har ek living beingin the world.
Ram wasn't just a husband at that crucial time. He had no other option when his brothers weren't ready to rule the kingdom. He wanted to go with her and live a peaceful life in the forest but being a king, he had no other option but he didn't marry any other woman which was in his hands (small saving grace). He lived for her love till he decided to go back to heaven. But what I liked is when Sita wasn't ready to take him back in her life and goes back where she came from (mother earth).
Even if he wasn't just a husband and also a king, does that justify his actions..he did take the oath of marrying af the woman only moni .that's y he didn't marry again..I'm sorry I can never support Ram for that action of his.it doesn't make him purushotam..before being the queen of Ayodhya and his wife,Sita was a woman..and no pregnant woman deserves to be treated in that way...
She proved her chastity in fire when he refused to take her back in Lanka..and again he wanted her to do agani pariksha..and there t theories that it wasn't the real sita whom Ravan captured..he had captured the maya sita.
And still he made a mockery of her chastity yaar..that was not fair..
The love between brothers..if the brothers had to live for Ram,y did they even marry..y is that the sufferings of the Sita's sisters was not being addressed...y dont people speak of the sacrifices by urmila..
Edited by The_incredible - 5 years ago