The Print Article - Indians ignore what was done to Subhadra - Page 11

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

His statement takes the same route

See there can be no reason or justification for name calling. His actions in the dice hall just highlights his mentality and nothing else. He was a narrow minded human being and nothing.

Coming to the text then text also at several places calls abhimanyu as "krishna s son" so i should i take it literally as abhimanyu being krishna s biological son and not arjuna and subdhara. The point is the text contradicts itself alot of there are hints for polyandry than there are also hints of drapaudi being only yudhishtra s wife so i will not like to neglect both the possibilities though i tend to tilt more towards the latter because of various reasons. But i guess we are never going to reach to a conclusion at this point so yes let us agree to disagree. 😆

Duscussions here have deviated from the main topic posted. Hence topic is closed.

Mahabharat DT.