Originally posted by: flipfl0p
She did not defend. In the first post I read, she did condemn the organisers, without any whataboutery.
(Page 14. .."
Nizamuddin is like a stop-over where hundreds and thousands of people are always there stopping by foreigners and indians but it was highly irresponsible of organisers to not take necessary step and to stop congregation , even though many of them are educated still they acted like arrogant jaahil people with a stubborn mindset .)
By then Polymo posted an event in a temple, Tania came up with something. She then stated, others also floated rules. Just that they were lucky.
This is a classic example of polarisation in IF.
What is polarisation?
Some salt which has formed due to ionic bond is dissolved in water. Solution is perfectly neutral. Dip two electrodes into the solution. Nothing happens. No particle will move. Now introduce battery and current in the circuit. Suddenly the neutral salt splits into positive and negative ions. Each ions start moving in opposite directions, conducting electricity.
In our IF, everyone are in agreement with the irresponsibility of the organisers. Nobody blaming Islam or Muslim community. Then Polymo and Tania appears, criticising either Hinduism or India. People start drifting from their neutral positions to extreme left or right. Angrybread appears to be defending organisers and I come out as defending Gujarat rioters.
Same thing with the country. Take our biased (including the so called neutral) media out. People can live in harmony.
5