Originally posted by: mannu_123
D major diff is Ram had married with his own choice n happiness.. n here ani keeps crying abt it whenever mini comes in d picture.. Ram was called maryada purushottam. I really doubt comparing both of them. Infact he left sita at d end n that might happen here after d leap, so yes there can be some similarities
But yes ani is a selfess person.. more than what general masses r capable of..
Hey dear, just wanted to say something on @bold context.
I am happy that you analyzed the part that Ani is not completely Ram because he didn't marry Bondita out of choice.
Writing that Lord Ram left Mata Sita, is absurd.
Apologies if you are hurt. But I think, I need to make this fact clear if I know this.
Lord Ram cannot leave anybody and Mata Sita cannot be abandoned. Mata Sita's respect was much more than just being subjected to baseless humiliations. She could have lived in Ayodhya, but Lord Ram wanted her to be away from the subjects that thought so unlikely of her. Justifying her again in front of everybody would be insane- and bad. Lord Ram became King Ram for his people. He suffered day and night with Mata Sita.
the woman he fought a war for.the woman who followed him without a question.
when she was kidnapped, he just started walking - knowing nothing of her whereabouts, just the fact that she is somewhere south. Screaming, asking from birds and trees, gathering an army - fighting demons - everything. And people think this man could abandon her willingly. This kinda pains me.
Now people talk about the Angnipariksha part - Mata Sita was the one who suggested it. Ram wanted her to not come back with him. He had to look after the kingdom- but couldn't hear anything against her. He told her this and Sita took this major step to be with him. But the next time- she went into the earth.
This thing could be interpreted in many ways, and it is. But we need to understand what really happened. The complexities of one's emotions. What if somebody writes our life story. People without reading it- start commenting about certain parts that are already complex to understand?
What we watch and hear - are just parts of a story. Without reading the real text we blind ourselves from the intricacies of the story.
Dear, please don't feel bad about this. Not only you but if anybody misunderstands this part - then this message for you.
If I hurt you, apologies again.