What impresses you more?

So, what do you feel is more praiseworthy? The ability to pull audiences to theatres or the ability to perform excellently in each film i.e. talent? I know it's a tough choice but you gotta pick one.

Vote and Comment.

I don't care much about either. For me what impresses about any actor is their ability to carry a movie. They can be a limited actor, but they need to have that aura to take the screenplay forward.

For example, Dishoom are a below average movie with bad acting, but if there was any positive about that movie(apart from Akshay Khanna) was Varun's ability to carry the scenes, as John was too stiff and Jacquline too blah.

I am myself confused which one to pick!!!

Good content and good performance.

Originally posted by: mintyblue

So, what do you feel is more praiseworthy? The ability to pull audiences to theatres or the ability to perform excellently in each film i.e. talent? I know it's a tough choice but you gotta pick one.

Vote and Comment.

They are both not mutually exclusive...A part of the ability to perform excellently is being able to pull the audience to the theaters...So yeah its not at all a tough choice...A combination of both for the win!👍🏼

Good movie with good performances :)

A good box office pull is must for success, most of the times. Then comes the performance, which even mediocre will sail the star through.

good movie with good performance