Is Ranveer more versatile than Ayushman and Ranbir?

I do feel as an actor Ranveer takes more risks and tips over into uncharted territory more often than Ranbir and Ayushman. His comfort in transitioning from a local Delhi boy to the man of few words in Lootera to suave Ricky behl, chichora Ram, aristocratic Bajirao, boyish Befikre and Dil dhadakne do and then the devilish Khilji.

Both Ranbir and Ayushman are better actors than him, IMHO. Ranbir, especially, brings his own sensitivities and sensibilities to all characters he plays which is a double edged sword. But they have yet to take the kind of risks that Ranveer has taken in his career so that does limit them as actors.

Ranveer's versatility is his USP and that has helped him to become a superstar. His acting is nowhere as good as the other two (especially Ranbir) but he does have a habit of being like a chameleon and slipping into any role, transforming his body language etc. That gives him an edge over the other 2.

Discuss.