Were Ayushmann and Ranveer really more deserving than Shahid - Page 4

Yes they deserved to win especially RS.. I have not seen Article 15 so cannot speak for Ayushman..

RS deserved the award for GB.. as far as shahid is concerned. it was a remake first of all and Shahid although he did a good job was same as VD ( he was top class) .

Loud acting needs to be appreciated? well I thought people said it shouldnt be during Padmaavat , that Shahid as Rawal Ratan > Ranveer as Khilji coz anyone can do loud acting, it is difficult to portray brooding subtle characters?

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

🤣 This whole thread. Poor baby Shahid 😭 How sad 😂 How sad he didn't get awarded for a role that promotes violence and abuse. 😭 How heartbreaking 🥺

Anyway, nice. Enough of problematic men getting awarded for their shitty roles. 😆Finally Bollywood is shedding some misogyny atleast. Woke dikh ne ke liye ya otherwise, next time someone will rethink before romanticizing an abusive piece of shit and presenting him as a hero so it's WIN for women in cinema! Go home. Award nehi milega bhai 😂 Also bet no other director will ever say 'if you can't slap your love ones, that's not love'

THIS!!!👍🏼 The normalization of such shitty abusive men as being True lover HAS TO STOP. God i hate the romanticization of physical and verbal abuse as being an intense lover. Molesting and abusing a women when she says no has been played out for laughs🤢

This normalization of abusive controlling stalkerish men is like providing more incentives to those unhinged males who harass women in the facade of "true love"👎🏼 already women have to live in fear from those deranged men. We have to stop this behavior in the society and not promote as Saccha Aashiq🤢

Originally posted by: LegolasGondolin

Yes they deserved to win especially RS.. I have not seen Article 15 so cannot speak for Ayushman..

RS deserved the award for GB.. as far as shahid is concerned. it was a remake first of all and Shahid although he did a good job was same as VD ( he was top class) .

Loud acting needs to be appreciated? well I thought people said it shouldnt be during Padmaavat , that Shahid as Rawal Ratan > Ranveer as Khilji coz anyone can do loud acting, it is difficult to portray brooding subtle characters?

Shahid didn't did loud acting or OTT acting like Khilji.

I didn't said Shahid in Padmavat was better than Ranveer, usko kuch diya hi nahi SLB ne, so ask that question to someone else.

Originally posted by: Cpt.DudleySmith

Some village idiots probably think the Academy endorsed cannibalism when they gave Anthony Hopkins the Oscar for The Silence of the lambs 😆.

Anthony won that award and that role in the film lasted under 20 minutes. If he can win than Alia in GB is same thing 🤣

Originally posted by: AllThatCritique

🤣 This whole thread. Poor baby Shahid 😭 How sad 😂 How sad he didn't get awarded for a role that promotes violence and abuse. 😭 How heartbreaking 🥺

Anyway, nice. Enough of problematic men getting awarded for their shitty roles. 😆Finally Bollywood is shedding some misogyny atleast. Woke dikh ne ke liye ya otherwise, next time someone will rethink before romanticizing an abusive piece of shit and presenting him as a hero so it's WIN for women in cinema! Go home. Award nehi milega bhai 😂 Also bet no other director will ever say 'if you can't slap your love ones, that's not love' LOL.

Do you reliaze acting awards are given for acting and not for how character is written and Shahid s potrayal of kabir singh was wat better than ranveer s murad or ayushmaan.

Aise toh even ranveer should not have won best actor for khilji how was that right and shahid winning wrong????

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever

Do you reliaze acting awards are given for acting and not for how character is written and Shahid s potrayal of kabir singh was wat better than ranveer s murad or ayushmaan.

Aise toh even ranveer should not have won best actor for khilji how was that right and shahid winning wrong????

Exactly👏