Bollywood Forum CC #30 - Page 36

Originally posted by: Zeal17

Sab gyaan baat rahe hai but no one telling difference between killing a newborn and killing unborn 24week.

bhai tu jo hain naa, ek ki katte mai ruka huwa hai.

Yeh rule expansion is done for women who are actually suffering, so just because you think some women might misuse it, so you will keep protesting is wrong. Rules are made for majority and not exceptions.

Originally posted by: Billi_Bangalan

nahi yaar logs. i was talking about minto notfresh. ab tang aa chuku hu same bore topics se

Originally posted by: RegressiveThug

bhai tu jo hain naa, ek ki katte mai ruka huwa hai.

Yeh rule expansion is done for women who are actually suffering, so just because you think some women might misuse it, so you will keep protesting is wrong. Rules are made for majority and not exceptions.

Arrey I never objected "suffering for medical reasons" to be aborted in that case I am fine with any point of time. My issue is with other reasons being brought in or pro-choice n my uterus my opinion people..

Killing babies no different from abortion, experts say.

Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.

The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.

Karlo beta normalise tum abortion, Oxford liberals will push for killing newborn next.. phir they will say kids who are not active or intelligent should also be killed...

Don't know but sumhow Nazi idealogy yaad aa rhi hai..

Originally posted by: RegressiveThug

That is point, there have been many instances where girls abort without letting the guy know, because they don't want their figure to be destroyed and so on, and other such reasond which are purelt motived by their selfish motives. Hence the consulting part came.

And we are discussing in general, I am not talking about a certain couple or a certain woman. In that general terms, a man is eligible to have a say, because a birth of a child isn't just the doing of a woman. It needs a man. To say that men shouldn't have any say about abortion in general, I'd like saying women shouldn't have any say about what men do.

Also it is not men's fault, that nature has made such rules that only females can bore kids.That doesn't mean, men cannot have saying in the process of birth.

Also you are talking about post pregnancy complications and so on. which comes under medical issues, so the person whom you are indirectly pinching, Zeal, has said he has issues with that. If a physician tells a girl that pregnancy can harm her in long run, and it is okay. See I don't even have problem with abortion due to whatever reasons because I feel everytime a woman does it, it is mostly the failure of someone else, either the father of the kid, her family members, her society, her workplace or her own body, which cannot handle pregnancy.

But their are cases, where women for selfish reasons, abort especially after embryo is formed, so that is the cases, the likes of Zeal have problem with. So it is nothing wrong for them to discuss it, and if we know he is going wrong, we can tell him. But by shutting him, we are making him more aggressive. Dialogue is important, we cannot and shouldn't shut someone if their opinion differs from us, that is what facist do, not rational people.

Bhai, whether the motive is selfish or not, who are we to decide? That's my exact point behind using that ' no uterus, no opinion' dialogue which in itself has a background to it in the show where it has been used. For you, the girl might look selfish for aborting the child for her body, but for her it might be a completely different reason altogether revolving around her body. There's no trial and error involved in this. Once a pregnancy happens, it happens irrespective of how it happened and abortion laws are legalized for the very same reason so that it can be terminated as per the person's wish. The main thing remains- whose body is it? The woman's. So she should have the right to choose what she does with it even when there's a pregnancy.

And yes, it's not a man's problem that nature has made a woman bear a child and that's exactly why such abortion laws exist, to go against nature for something that you do not want at the moment.

And no, there comes a point in time where it is okay to say shut up instead of spewing complete nonsense because no matter how much logic you provide, how much awareness you spread, they will not be able to understand and go on and on. So can't help!

Zeal should have been born as a woman. He would have done so much social service by giving his babies for adoption. RT would have probably married him and would be a supporting husband to her and Khai R Hagi wouldn't probably look twice at Zeal as his standards are high.

Abhi tak inki baccha party khatam nahi hui. Tum sab virgin hi rahoge zindagi bhar, toh kya farak padta hai duniya baccha rakhe ya chhode..

Originally posted by: Billi_Bangalan

nahi yaar logs. i was talking about minto notfresh. ab tang aa chuku hu same bore topics se

Even Minionite ended up saying that while closing her topic 😆.

We, females should just get our tubes tied 😵. Everyone has a say when we are supposed to get married, when we can give kids, how many kids we should have, be shamed for gaining weight after pregnancy, deal with their responsibility but how dare we if we are not ready to have kids.