Kangana on JNU and CAA at the ThinkEDU conclave 2020 - Page 8

Brilliant, this lady is on point and its exactly what Kangana has said too

https://twitter.com/i/status/1215477548169060352

Originally posted by: ~*sindhu*~

I saw the clarification she came up with later when it was made an issue. Nothing before it.

Again u can speak for urself but not for the rest of the people of the state. There is no law to stop people from voicing their concern or speak up when they think something is wrong. Its all good if u r ok with it, but as per Supreme Court its unconstitutional.

If people are at fault actions will be taken against them and its not necessary that everytime they are called out they have to be in the wrong. Like I say they amplify the issues by labeling them as anti national and tukde tukde gang, even if they protesting for fees hike. Slightest possibility exists for everything even the idea that maybe they are not at fault to a point to be called anti national.

@bold I, being from J&K, cannot talk about the rest of the people of my state but one's sitting on JNU can, really? Are you kidding me?

@underlined Supreme court called banning of internet services unconstitutional, and when did I ever say that I was ok with it? I'm not ok with it either. I want internet services to resume as soon as it can as it's causing a great deal of problems. I was not ok with people sitting in other places of the country chanting Free Kashmir assuming people of entire Kashmir want the same and Supreme Court didn't call it constitutional either. It's like sitting in India and voting for Brexit. We can voice our opinions ourselves, we are more capable of that.

@italics I have made myself clear why I think they are anti national and I think anyone who wants a one India will call them the same. They are ANTI-NATIONAL for putting India in an uncomfortable situation on International level and giving our neighbors enough material to call out our country for their stand on Kashmir which they have no idea how sensitive it is and how much atrocities it has caused to is people for so long.

Originally posted by: justlife

No, nobody gives you the right to call anyone anti-national, because you are no authority. Simply a judgmental blabbermouth who loves BJP and it's twisted agendas. "Free Kashmir" doesn't imply letting go of it, it simply implies for the state to enjoy the same freedom as other Indian states - which it has not for more than 5 months now. In such difficult times, it is our duty as Indian citizens to stand by our fellow citizens. So unless you don't identify people of Kashmir as "Indians", I don't see anything wrong with a "Free Kashmir" poster.

Let me tell you I'm living in J&K and I assure you we are enjoying every bit of freedom so stop believing anything and everything that's said on Twitter. If you think not having mobile internet connection=not having freedom then you seriously need a reality check...lol... Also I don't support internet ban and it's causing a quite a lot of problem because people who don't have Wi-Fi in their place have to go to cyber cafes to access things. Life suddenly seems to have gone 15 years backwards when internet was not popular here.

You are talking about people of Kashmir, did you ask us if we want you to stand for us? Did we tell you we want freedom? Have you ever been to J&K? Pehle yahan aao, yahan aake dekho aur fir kuch bolo, bas internet pe kuch b bakwas dekh k bhashan mat do.

@bold What you said there is what is expected from most of your kind, as I said before, if someone supports a particular narrative, he/she conveniently termed as a Bhakt/BJP supporter or a Pidi/Congress supporter or an AAPtard and you are one of them so no surprise in what you said.

Originally posted by: justlife

@Bold - Would you say their retaliation was proportional to what happened earlier?

No.

But there is no proportionality when fighting/violence is involved. (I hit you only once, but you hit me twice). Irrational behaviours don't come with logic.

Originally posted by: flipfl0p

No.

But there is no proportionality when fighting/violence is involved. (I hit you only once, but you hit me twice). Irrational behaviours don't come with logic.

Yes, I agree that being violent first gives other the right to be violent back. But I disagree with the fact that there is no proportionality. If I twist your arm, you have the right to hit me back, but not break my head. There is provocation and then there is intent.