Originally posted by: intruderfast
It does but last week it didn't. Sana indirectly made a fool of sid. That's my take. Of course sid was silent but was silent . Sana did all this cos of her ego. She herself admitted that when sana sid patched up later. So it was not a strategy ,it was ego .
Sid said ego be based decision hamesha harmful hote hain.
And when sana convinced other HM to save sid by sacrificing dining table., it was kind of insult to sid . Will sid, who is ready to sacrifice anything for his team will ever agree to it.
The nomination task was a complete goof up by sana. She not agreeing to mahira kaa name I understand. But for others no.
Was Sana’s statement there regarding her ego with reference to nominations? I am not arguing for the sake of it, but haven’t a lot of the tasks earlier been spoilt coz of Sid’s ego and aggression? Just saying, not accusing. I am saying in many ways both are chips off the same block.
As for the dining table, it was exposing others and their hypocrisy and not insulting Sid. Again, I understand your opinion as a Sid fan and since I am somewhere on the other side of the fence, we shall agree to disagree.
Who do you mean by others? Who else was she to save? Aarti? So that Sid vote bank could jointly vote for Mahira and Sid? Hehe... you think Sana is that silly? She may be egoistic and if Sid was with her she would not have been that ruthless. That’s all 😆 Getting all nominated was clean strategy, though based on ego.
Edited by Uma2010 - 5 years ago