Ganda box theory - who got benefit from that? - Page 8

Rashmi did not lose more in the end.

Shukla had a knight in shining armor image. He lost it months ago.

Rashmi played villain and bahu. She never claimed to be a sari savitri. She tolerated shukla’s bullying for months. Just becausebhost thinks she is digging her hole, doesn’t make it gospel. There are lots of public out there supporting her and can see Shukla for the bully and abuser that he is.

Originally posted by: Deadinside

With that hand gestures and that expression on his face, One can clearly see what he meant by aise. That's totally a different debate about how he twisted & he hasn't said in that way. He deliberately made it like this so he can get away with it - ki maine toh kuch gandha nhi bola but beta audience ko chutiya mat banao idhar action speak louder than words, Tum bologe nhi fir bhi dill main kya hai pata chal he jayega specially when you have that disgusting smirk on your face.

You can re read my post again, exactly what I said. But to get that support from audience Rashmi needed to handle it better.

By all her Nautanki she diluted the issue. But however you understand whatever you want to understand, unless something is said, you can't hold him responsible for NOT SAYING.

Hand gestures have shown Rashmi Desai so that doesn't mean anything bad. Expression is one of Taunt & anger so there also you can't read anything abnormal. Both were. On top of that Rashmi used language dirty as hell and I'm sure audience is not chutiye to not understand What card dirty mouth is trying to play and what type of woman she is was also exposed to the audience. So intotal she lost much more than Sid with "Aisi Larki"

Originally posted by: SoPunk

You can re read my post again, exactly what I said. But to get that support from audience Rashmi needed to handle it better.

By all her Nautanki she diluted the issue. But however you understand whatever you want to understand, unless something is said, you can't hold him responsible for NOT SAYING.

Hand gestures have shown Rashmi Desai so that doesn't mean anything bad. Expression is one of Taunt & anger so there also you can't read anything abnormal. Both were. On top of that Rashmi used language dirty as hell and I'm sure audience is not chutiye to not understand What card dirty mouth is trying to play and what type of woman she is was also exposed to the audience. So intotal she lost much more than Sid with "Aisi Larki"

Originally posted by: SoPunk

Kabhi nehi ..

Isn't that what Salman ultimately meant, by rejecting her plan?

I think he was trying to guide her in the right direction. It was like how we get mad at the people we’re close to and shout at them for being stupid for doing something. It didn’t look like the usual bashing lol

He must think of Shukla as a lost cause so he doesn’t bother advising him or calling him out for anything. Plus we have the channel’s bias towards Shukla.

Originally posted by: hasini009

not only forum. Sid ko bhi aisa hi laga. iss liye clarification maanga salman se. salman bhi shukla ki’aisi ladki’ jaise abba dabba jabba karke nikal gaya🤣

exactly it was 2 abba dabba jabba moment in a single episode

It was hilarious how desperate Sid was 😆

Him asking for clarification from salman khan can't change his actual meaning

Bang on 👏 but this is IF and majority of members are anti Sid here, they're smart to understand everything but still gonna bash him.