Sidnaaz-true or false- thread 3 - Page 12

Originally posted by: CatcherInTheRye

@Uma

Kya re?

Originally posted by: dahibhalle

Ok .Finally saw the episode and Team Sana all the way.

There are only two people in the house whose fights I enjoy- Sana and Paras because both of them don't take their fights seriously.

Mahira is too sensitive - she can dish it but not take it and you realise how much a suraksha kavach Paras is for her.

I am liking Shefali also - she is such an instigator 😆

I probably lack in empathy as well because my reaction to Rashmi's injury was the same as Sana- "drama".

Rashni is too vile a person to play victim.

Sana actually asked Mahira to stop after a point because entertainment ka quota ho gaya apparently 🤣

I couldn’t empathize with Rashmi’s injury for three reasons- she was really insensitive with her Mahi mar gaya narrative, Mahira’s body shaming the entire day and ofcourse trying to blame Sana for the violence she invited upon herself boxing into a box.

Originally posted by: Uma2010

Kya re?

Originally posted by: CatcherInTheRye

uma r we fraaands?😆

No! 🤣

Sana needs to stop interfering in Mahira and Paras’s matters . They can handle it themselves . She looks negative by doing all this .

Originally posted by: Uma2010

Sana actually asked Mahira to stop after a point because entertainment ka quota ho gaya apparently 🤣

I couldn’t empathize with Rashmi’s injury for three reasons- she was really insensitive with her Mahi mar gaya narrative, Mahira’s body shaming the entire day and ofcourse trying to blame Sana for the violence she invited upon herself boxing into a box.

My Mum calls her shaitan and that is what she is.

It was interesting how these women built a narrative with zero evidence that Sana was responsible for Rashmi's injury.

Shefali was so interesting .She was probably smarting through the day because of Sana's mimicry but instead of using this issue she instigated Rashmi and used Rashmi to score against Sana.

Originally posted by: Uma2010

No! 🤣

Originally posted by: CatcherInTheRye

uma r we fraaands?😆

🤣🤣

Originally posted by: CatcherInTheRye

uma r we fraaands?😆

🤣🤣

Originally posted by: Uma2010

Achelvi 😡 Don’t run wild with your thoughts 😡

In the purest form of man-woman relationships in India and the world across, we love proximity with our friends. We want them to sit with us and orbit around us. We love touching them whenever possible. We hate our friends talking to others and we reprimand them too. Hugs and kisses are a given. Caressing, cuddling, being territorial- all these are unadulterated signs of friendship 🤗

However, if anything amongst these is not done and a distance is maintained, it’s love and what’s the point of speaking of that here? What do we know of such things? We know only about friendship 🤗

Colors and BB can do whatever they want and screen whatever they want. I don’t believe in love waise bhi. I am a very friendship kind of person 🤗

Agreed on each and every word. Fship is bliss. Purest form of relation. A relation by choice .

I love their fship. Everything doesnt have to have a love tag. I am liking this bonding with friends.

I am also very close to some of my Friends (girls) and it's pure platonic. Hugs kisses are normal. Hanging out at each other places. Night caps and all are all normal

As long as two ppl are comfortable, I see no issues . It is the viewers who need to broaden their mindset