Originally posted by: SP2684
So normally - that's what the game is - verbal instigation and all that. But because it's Shukla - and Shukla toh devta hain - toh the verbal instigation justifies Shukla's haath chalana, cuz you know - provocation and all. Matlab kai ko koi kuch bole and Shukla punches them in the face - tab bhi - kyu bola bhai? Shukla bechare ki problem hain na uska gussa? 😭
Phir toh Rashmi should've slapped Shukla yesterday - justified hota woh bhi. Shefali should've slapped him too - I read on main forum kya gandi cheez bola uske liye. Asim should have too - uske baap pe gaya yeh. But na - the rules are different for Shukla.
See I don't care if people find Asim wrong for using Shukla's so called weakness - I don't think his anger issues are a weakness; I think they're absolute shit - or for instigating him. That's each to their own. I have a problem with violence being justified using that. If verbal stuff justifies violence, toh then as I said - sabse zyaada laat toh Shukla ko padni chahiye.