Originally posted by: najma123
See, as far as what suffices and what doesn't, it's Anurag's right to feel comfortable with the people around him, and he also has the rights to demand it when it's not being given personal privacy, my point was just that, though, he may be conveying his feelings out, would he be at a greater disadvantage if he's a little more vociferous than he is now at present?
And he's a grown up guy, who can pretty well gauge people's mentality, even he can figure out that Komo isn't someone who gets subtle hints, he could see that when she tried ambushing him in his office. So, when you are dealing with someone like that, the next logical thing would be to convey your discomfort more strongly. Now, if that doesn't work, then all hell breaks loose. But, here, I'd blame the CVs, they are probably gearing up for some nonsense OTT drama with this SR bullshit.
Of course there's no harm in being more vociferous..
But that's beside my point. My point is that in such a situation why is the onus falling on the victim (in this case anurag), to be more clear, or try to explain again etc.. That is too much to expect from the person who is under stress and to be frank, what makes us think that the molester(komolika in this case) will listen the second or the third time.? will a person who is the type to understand the other person's discomfort not do so the first time around itself?
I'm just highlighting the sad reality, where even under such circumstances the onus of explaining falls on the victim. This is what all the movements and campaigns are about. A simple NO should suffice." I'm not comfortable" is explanation enough. Anurag is a victim here. There's just no question of he should explain more to a person like sonalika. I'm sorry but I'm simply not going to get on board with that.
