Sardard Shukla's utterly CHEAP comment on Devoleena !!! - Page 2

Originally posted by: Coldplaying

Did he say he meant Paras and Dey?

so why give him the benefit of doubt?

sid dey could also mean to aarti that she is very good at giving massage

why didnt sid gave dey that benefit of doubt to him

you can turn and twist things around to make them sound better

matter of fact is both are wrong and meant it the wrong way there is no coming back from this

Originally posted by: sunshine333

By jiske saath soti ho he meant rashmi. Debos bedmate

Tuesday task is about boys saving girls how come he meant rashmi saving devo??🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

Originally posted by: sunshine333

By jiske saath soti ho he meant rashmi. Debos bedmate

she also slept with a guy at the start

so that dosent work either

Originally posted by: ayaan786

so why give him the benefit of doubt?

sid dey could also mean to aarti that she is very good at giving massage

why didnt sid gave sid that benefit of doubt to him

you can turn and twist things around to make them sound better

matter of fact is both are wrong and meant it the wrong way there is no coming back from this

Why accuse him without any conclusive evidence?

Originally posted by: Coldplaying

Why accuse him without any conclusive evidence?

Because some have made up their mind about him, and choosing to see the worst in him.

Originally posted by: Coldplaying

Why accuse him without any conclusive evidence?

why did shukla attack dey without conclusive evidence?

with that logic nobody in this forum isnt allowed to blame anyone wither because they lack the evidence

why give shukla that special treatment?

Originally posted by: ayaan786

she also slept with a guy at the start

so that dosent work either

he said i will quit the show. He clearly didn’t mean Paras. Why could he NOT have meant Rashmi?

Originally posted by: sahisri

Tuesday task is about boys saving girls how come he meant rashmi saving devo??🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

Rashmi saving devos ladder. Rashmi was MIA if u notice during the confrontation.

Originally posted by: Coldplaying

He clearly meant Rashmi and other girls. Devoleena was defending her ladder on her own and no other girls were there for her. He clearly meant that. It was Devoleena who accused him of sleeping with Sana and not saving her.

So he meant Rashmi - said Devo sleeps with Rashmi and yet Rashmi didn’t choose her, I presume? But if Devo tells him that he sleeps with Sana and yet didn’t save her, that’s objectionable? Why - ah, because the men-women thing. No equality here. But not for me - the intent remains the same, and he doesn’t get a pass because who he said Devo sleeps with might've been a woman - Shuklaji should’ve taken a leaf outta Devo’s book and been specific, since I’m told he’s plenty ballsy and all.

Oh my god! Can’t believe to what extent people defend their favourites. If he didn’t mention Paras or any other guy we can give him the benefit of doubt that it is Rashmi? Are you kidding me?