But then why make Hanuman suffer in a bad marriage to put across this message. A happy marriage and a happy Hanuman will give the same message...
Okay, I agree. But then it still implies that the problem was entirely Babita's in her first marriage. She wasn't able to keep Ashok happy and he was in a bad marriage. He decided to opt for EMA. On the other hand, Hanuman decides to suffer silently instead... I am sorry I still don't agree with the messaging or more like the way the message is being put across...
Also, then are we not justifying Ashok? because nothing really justifies EMA... not even a bad marriage...
The truth is that in real life, good people do get hurt, often through no fault of their own. You'd think that a man who has suffered the way HS has both in his childhood and because of losing Imarti, would get some respite. He has also been so lonely all these years, and finally with this new light in his life, we wanted him to have all the happiness in the world. Our CVs though, want to show that everything comes at a price and that life is not perfect.
No, two wrongs don't make a right. No matter what his marriage with Babita was like, EMA is never acceptable. I don't know what Babita was like with Ashok, especially the first 7 years before he met Meeta, they haven't shown us enough of that.
When I said men suffer in bad marriages, I was referring to HS, not Ashok. A lot of men do suffer mentally because they choose to remain married for the sake of their kids. I just don't want HS to go through with the marriage despite feeling unhappy, just for the sake of Minnie, and worse still to remain married to Babita because of Minnie. Not ideal.
