Rangoli attacks Taapsee - Page 5

Originally posted by: Stargazing71

Rangoli started off as the younger sister when kangana first came to Bollywood

Its only now that they have swapped birth order.

Whatever the age they are extremely immature and rude. Lying is also a problem.

But kangana through her own superiorty complex and arrogance will never be a part pf these ensemble casts which would avtually make money too

She was clearly being a shady hypocrite once again. What was the need to bring Kangana in this conversation when she knows how the last few times she did that ended up?

She was supposed to let go of the matter as the bigger person as per her first reply to Kangana {shrug}

Taapse found a way to be talked about without antagonising starkids and Kjo AND the bonus is that nowadays Kangana is the n°1 enemy.

Originally posted by: anjs

This is what Tapsee said and I agree with it..........

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now during an interaction with Mid Day, Taapsee spoke about how Kangana stating, "If I meet her, I will graciously walk up and say hello to her, or even her sister. It was triggered because I said she needs a double filter. Even Anurag [Kashyap] and I need that. How is that a negative thing? I saw her as an honest person. It's sad that she says a woman cannot call out another woman. I will call out people basis who is wrong and right, and not based on what gender they belong to. Feminism is about an equal platform."

Taapsee further said, "She has always spoken about how a woman should support another woman, but I did not hear any words of praise for my films. There are five women in Mission Mangal. Is she praising us? I am her junior and don't have [as vast] a filmography as her, but I have done a decent number of films for someone to be appreciative of it."

The actor concluded by saying that Kangana exposed herself. She said, "It was a shock because it came from someone I always admired. I felt disappointed. When someone you had put on a pedestal does this, it makes you question if you were right in looking up to her. In my response, I said I am happy being a copy because she is a damn good actress. I am sasta because she claims to be the highest-paid [female actor]. I don't see it as derogatory. Just because she is saying it, doesn't mean it's the ultimate truth. She didn't expose me; she exposed herself. It's awkward but I won't hold it against her. I love her as a performer and will continue to do so."

Originally posted by: YoWorld

Kangana is just 32?????feels like she's been in the industry from decades

She arrived only one year before Deepika and Sonam.

Gangster released in 2006 while OSO and Saawarya released in 2007.

Originally posted by: Maraka_Musso89

She arrived only one year before Deepika and Sonam.

Gangster released in 2006 while OSO and Saawarya released in 2007.

Does this logic apply?

Sonam is born in 1985..Without a doubt. She is 34.

So should Kangana be born in 1984 to have a debut one yr ahead of her? Should be 35.

I know absurd logic.. But..

considering Rangoli mata has become expert in taking pot-shots on anyone even slightly talking against her sister, Taapsee should have avoided saying anything against the queen actress.

honestly, Rangoli or whoever running this account, has definitely pushed a lot of kangana fans away. I mean really! she should give herself a break for christ's sake

Why do people still think it's rangoli who is tweeting... I think it's pretty obvious by now it's kangana. She probably has another account too, from where she follows Hrithik, ALL of his fan club handles, and rest of the star kids she she obsessed with. She for sure had an insta handle too.... I remember once Jacqueline made a dancing video with Hrithik and just few days after it , out of nowhere, kangana praised Jacqueline for some Insta video of hers

Originally posted by: niyati13

Does this logic apply?

Sonam is born in 1985..Without a doubt. She is 34.

So should Kangana be born in 1984 to have a debut one yr ahead of her? Should be 35.

I know absurd logic.. But..

Well Kangana always said she debuted at 18/19 while Sonam debuted at 21/22.

So even of she debuted before Sonam she could still be younger.

Shraddha debuted well after Sonam and they are the same age.