Court case on Hanuman singh

This might sound as nitpicking, but after today's episode I have a question.

Imarti had a brain tumor - in some advanced stage where operation was necessary. So after all discussion they went on for the operation. If Imarti died due to operation- how exactly is it culpable homicide by Hanuman Singh? (Unless Hanuman Singh operated on her- highly unlikely). If at all- it could be medical negligence- a culpable homicide by doctor but then dangers of operation were explained in advance. So actually there's no tangible reason to file culpable homicide. Hanuman Singh would have understood the law better as he is policeman.

Am I the only one who thinks that the writers kind of goofed up here? It looked like they were going for some dark idea and then suddenly made decision to show something less controversial.

this is what i was saying. i understand guilt in hanuman singh. but a court case for that is taking things too far

This is why it was thrown out of lower courts and then her father somehow managed to get it reopened in higher court, maybe with some influence.

NB did say that her father had lost his mind after Imarti's death which is why he took such a step. Perhaps the fact that she agreed to the surgery because of HS is what bothered him. She was his only child, what else did he have to go on in this old age after losing such a lovely child who had always been so full of life? I didn't see her mother so he might have been a widower. He is in exactly the same position as HS right now, lonely, somewhat lost, and hurting.

I think this explanation is simple enough.

I just LOVED the way HS called him bapu, he was the father figure HS had always looked for. To be shunned by him after Imarti's death must have hurt like hell. He was HS' remaining connection with Imarti, and vice versa. Rather than bonding over their grief, it tore them apart. They both could have found solace in each other's company over the years but both were burning, alone, and restless.

HS was very well aware of the condition of Imarti

sardar singh accused him for delay in operation? 😕

What was Sardar Singh's stance on the operation? Was he for it or against it?

Even though Imarti would have gotten a few days to live, she was in immense pain. And yes, the operation was risky but at least they would've put in the effort to save her life.

And it's not like Sardar Singh wouldn't have known about her condition beforehand. I just don't understand how HS could be held responsible for this. He did everything he humanly could to help save her and yet he still failed.

Originally posted by: asmaanixx

What was Sardar Singh's stance on the operation? Was he for it or against it?

Even though Imarti would have gotten a few days to live, she was in immense pain. And yes, the operation was risky but at least they would've put in the effort to save her life.

And it's not like Sardar Singh wouldn't have known about her condition beforehand. I just don't understand how HS could be held responsible for this. He did everything he humanly could to help save her and yet he still failed.

Seedhi si baat hai. Beti ki maut ke gham me bawra ho gaya tha uska bapu.

Originally posted by: asmaanixx

What was Sardar Singh's stance on the operation? Was he for it or against it?

Even though Imarti would have gotten a few days to live, she was in immense pain. And yes, the operation was risky but at least they would've put in the effort to save her life.

And it's not like Sardar Singh wouldn't have known about her condition beforehand. I just don't understand how HS could be held responsible for this. He did everything he humanly could to help save her and yet he still failed.

I think writers made an attempt to wrap things up without making it more complicated.

Legally speaking- neither Sardar Singh or Hanuman or even doctors could be held responsible as Imarti was an adult and only she can give consent for operation and any complications possible. Had Hanuman stopped Imarti from receiving treatment then it's a different thing. But that's not the case here.

This particular treck is weakest so far in the serial in my opinion.

Originally posted by: inlieu

This is why it was thrown out of lower courts and then her father somehow managed to get it reopened in higher court, maybe with some influence.

NB did say that her father had lost his mind after Imarti's death which is why he took such a step. Perhaps the fact that she agreed to the surgery because of HS is what bothered him. She was his only child, what else did he have to go on in this old age after losing such a lovely child who had always been so full of life? I didn't see her mother so he might have been a widower. He is in exactly the same position as HS right now, lonely, somewhat lost, and hurting.

I think this explanation is simple enough.

I just LOVED the way HS called him bapu, he was the father figure HS had always looked for. To be shunned by him after Imarti's death must have hurt like hell. He was HS' remaining connection with Imarti, and vice versa. Rather than bonding over their grief, it tore them apart. They both could have found solace in each other's company over the years but both were burning, alone, and restless.

Actually- it's not possible to file case against HS in the first place as he legally can't make any decision regarding medical treatment for Imarti. She is clearly an adult. Only way he could be filed for homicide is if he himself operated on Imarti despite no qualifications or Imarti wanted to get treated and he blocked her access to treatment. Neither of which is true. Also it's not like HS gave her brain tumor. Had Imarti died due to HIV AIDS given by HS then it would still make sense to file a case against him. But in the given situation it will take some great amount of foolishness to think that HS is responsible in any way.

Writers just tried to wrap up the mess without putting much thought into it.

This was exactly what was going on in my mind throughout the episode. The CVs wrapped up the emotional aspect but what about the legal one? If they had shown HS agreeing to not forcing Imarti for the operation I could've still somewhat understood the case getting accepted in court on the basis of negligence/blocking the operation. As in FIL could've thought HS stopped his daughter from getting the operation done instead of it being Imarti's own decision. "Her love for him killed her" because HS wanted to prolong her time with him rather than her time on Earth.

Par yaha toh operation dikhaya. On what basis was Sartaj Chautala's plea even accepted into court (that too twice in both upper and lower). There has to be a legal provision in law.

Was it because he didn't rush her immediately to the hospital when he found out about the headaches and the disease became worse and incurable to an extent? In which case there was no elaboration on the fact. This track felt sloppy and halfhearted to me. The writers are good so they can weave in emotions and make a wonderful episode, but what about the legal implications?

Originally posted by: tk2015

This was exactly what was going on in my mind throughout the episode. The CVs wrapped up the emotional aspect but what about the legal one? If they had shown HS agreeing to not forcing Imarti for the operation I could've still somewhat understood the case getting accepted in court on the basis of negligence/blocking the operation. As in FIL could've thought HS stopped his daughter from getting the operation done instead of it being Imarti's own decision. "Her love for him killed her" because HS wanted to prolong her time with him rather than her time on Earth.

Par yaha toh operation dikhaya. On what basis was Sartaj Chautala's plea even accepted into court (that too twice in both upper and lower). There has to be a legal provision in law.

Was it because he didn't rush her immediately to the hospital when he found out about the headaches and the disease became worse and incurable to an extent? In which case there was no elaboration on the fact. This track felt sloppy and halfhearted to me. The writers are good so they can weave in emotions and make a wonderful episode, but what about the legal implications?

I agree. The emotional impact is there for sure. It's the legal aspect that is leaving me a bit stumped. Unless there's something that we're missing. After all, Naeem Bi and Lala didn't go with Hanuman to the hospital and dunno if Imarti's dad was there too. (It'll be weird if he wasn't.)

So unless something happened at the hospital itself, I don't see how Sardar could make his case.