Tumhari Sulu Is Hit but not Judgmental Hai Kya???? - Page 2

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Ofcourse thats what it means, they're not going to award an average peformance now arent they? whoever delivers pathbrreaking work they will give it to them.

Now Kangana film has collected more and she has acted better- still we are fleeing from the truth and not giving credit where its due.

truth is JHK is a flop but Kangu is being praised by many critics and a section of audience, just like Vidya's performance was.

Just that Vidya's movie turned out to be an average grosser while JHK flopped because it has a higher costing.

Awards ka kiya hai, jo jata hai, usko milta hai, Kangu attend karega toh usko bhi milega.

Main truth is, mass audience didn't cared about Sulu nor they cared about JHK.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

truth is JHK is a flop but Kangu is being praised by many critics and a section of audience, just like Vidya's performance was.

Just that Vidya's movie turned out to be an average grosser while JHK flopped because it has a higher costing.

Awards ka kiya hai, jo jata hai, usko milta hai, Kangu attend karega toh usko bhi milega.

Main truth is, mass audience didn't cared about Sulu nor they cared about JHK.

Oh so now no one cared about TUmhari Sulu? the film was a big hit and Vidya sweeped all the awards lol..how can you say it doesnt matter?

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Oh so now no one cared about TUmhari Sulu? the film was a big hit and Vidya sweeped all the awards lol..how can you say it doesnt matter?

tu pehle yeh teh karle ki Tumhari Sulu average hai ya hit hai

baaki chutiyagiri baad mai reh karte hai.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

tu pehle yeh teh karle ki Tumhari Sulu average hai ya hit hai

baaki chutiyagiri baad mai reh karte hai.

hahahahaha I knew it....I knew that some will drag down Vidya only to drag Kangana down further....its not about hits or flops, its about appreciation. I dont know why its so difficult for people to admit that Kangana delivered in JHK and it was a pathbreaking, earth-shattering and monumental performance.

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

hahahahaha I knew it....I knew that some will drag down Vidya only to drag Kangana down further....its not about hits or flops, its about appreciation. I dont know why its so difficult for people to admit that Kangana delivered in JHK and it was a pathbreaking, earth-shattering and monumental performance.

again Tumhari Sulu big hit hai ya average hai, as you talked about collection in your OP.

Baaki ka randi rona uske baad continue karenge.

Originally posted by: Thug-Leader

again Tumhari Sulu big hit hai ya average hai, as you talked about collection in your OP.

Baaki ka randi rona uske baad continue karenge.

But thats beyond the point...whether its an average hit or hit thats an average...the point is why other appreciates Vidya but throw Kangana Balan under the bus for her strong performances? is it cuz of nepotism and because Kapoor hubby ?

It boils my water that one is considered a hit and the other isn’t. JHK was screened in Rashtrapati Bhavan for criss sakes. So what if it flopped, it still is a big deal to be screened for free.

Truth is that Kangana is a Huge threat to movie mafia and theatre owners. A movie that collects 4 crores on day 1 is huge and so they underreported how much it made to undermine the war hero that is our Kangana!!

tumhari Ullu isn’t half the movie JHK is!

Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan

Tumhari Sulu collected a mere 32 cr in its run and yet people always considered it some kind of successful huge box office hit that was pathbreaking?

Kangana's JHK collects more than that and still people are maligning her and calling the flop a "big flop" and epic disaster....why are there different rules for Balan?

Vidya gave 7 flops after Kahaani and nobody ever dared to say that she was "over"....so whats the deal? She did lots of bad films too like Boobi Jasoos

Huge? It was just profitable. Story, execution and acting was appreciated.

Vidya doesn't claim to be the highest paid actress or the only real actor in n industry full of models..her relatives don't advice others to do her Pooja or bring others down by calling them sasti copy. She doesn't snatch others' credit.. doesn't get her costars' scenes edited.

Plus, nor the makers nor actors publicised Tumhari Sulu as 'the most relevant film of the year'..another matter that none of the audience called it faaltu, ghatiya, boring, confusing or headache inducing.

People did say she was over after a series of flops..be assured of that. Today she is still considered a good actress but not successful right now. Coz success is temporary, talent and character is permanent.

Originally posted by: TakingAStand2

It boils my water that one is considered a hit and the other isn’t. JHK was screened in Rashtrapati Bhavan for criss sakes. So what if it flopped, it still is a big deal to be screened for free.

Truth is that Kangana is a Huge threat to movie mafia and theatre owners. A movie that collects 4 crores on day 1 is huge and so they underreported how much it made to undermine the war hero that is our Kangana!!

tumhari Ullu isn’t half the movie JHK is!

haha exactly. This is all the plan of movie mafia and this is what they want. They want to supress Kangana so all these other untalented ungrateful and unrefined star kids can succeed. This is the master plan and thats why Amitabh hasnt sent Kangana flowers for her performances.

But guess what? I am not going to let Karan Johar win, Kalank flopped because of me AND I will ensure each star kid fails too. I want Vidya, Kangana, Tara, to go ahead- they are our true Bharat Ki Betiyan

Tumhari sulu is about a strong willed woman who wants to create her own career path!! JHK is about a psychopath!! Why get confused?? It is simple logic!! People will any day watch positive movies not some black psychotic comedy