uhum!…Dear Very qualified Doctor I know they teach this at most Medical Universities ...A drowning is NOT a "natural death" basically drowning is defined as: respiratory impairment as a result of having mouth/nose under liquid/water, therefore it is usually logically considered accidental drowning secondary to an accident, fall, loss of consciousness, heart issues, too much alcohol consumption. Drowning is most often quick and unspectacular. It takes only a few minutes, and very little water and I can quote you figures and data of all the accidental drownings per year, but that would be long and boring.You're right.
It is wrong to label him a "murderer". There is no proof.
But I do not believe she died a natural death either.
Just wanted to share my opinion based on the limited facts available.
Let me just mention that: The use of alcohol increases the risk for drowning across developed and developing nations. Alcohol is involved in approximately 50% of fatal drownings, and 35% of non-fatal drownings( those who are given CPR) Among adolescents and adults, alcohol use is involved in almost a quarter of emergency department visits for drowning.
Why do I highlight alcohol use and drowning...well because I think it may be related to the tragic death, and for privacy reasons and humane reasons the authorities and the family chose to not disclose details that may mar the stars legacy and reputation. I agree with them.
As far as "official" forms are concerned, I do not know what the norm is in the country she passed away in, but I can tell you that a letter signed by a high ranking officer or a document approved by one, holds more baring than a file form. It is a "carte blanche" per say. In particular when it is a courtesy to a dignitary from a foreign country.
Because a diagnosis of drowning is considered one of the most difficult in forensic medicine. External examination and autopsy findings are often non-specific, and the available laboratory tests are often inconclusive. Therefore, the doctors or medical respondents to the scene would consider drowning as a possible cause of death when the body was recovered from a body of water, or in close proximity to a fluid which could plausibly have caused drowning, or when found with the head immersed in a fluid. A medical diagnosis of death by drowning is generally made after other possible causes of death have been excluded by means of a complete autopsy and toxicology tests. Indications of drowning are seldom completely unambiguous, and may include bloody froth in the airway, water in the stomach, cerebral edema and petrous or mastoid hemorrhage.
So you see Dear Doctor, the medical team in that country must of done their due diligence they looked at everything, tested everything and reached the conclusion that they did. The authorities of not one but two countries are satisfied with the findings and the cause of death, and so is the family. No one should be questioning or creating falsehoods or distorting the facts to create controversy and get five minutes of fame.
I assure you NO ONE was more hurt at her loss than her own family, certainly not the gossip mongers or the pseudo book writers. To her family it was a tragedy, no matter how it happened and when people start twisting the details and force the family to disclose the facts as for example that she was under the influence of alcohol or medication that adds insult to injury, and breaches their right to privacy and to keep her memory intact.
I hope they leave the family alone, and I hope she is resting in peace.
13