Like i said in my initial comment, abhigya should be together to make their fans happy, but this new gen/ post-leap is clearly being enjoyed by people like myself who was not a fan of the show ever, and the continuing high trp's show that the trp audience isn't annoyed or disinterested in the new leap or new gen and are fine with continuing watching KKB with the new gen in it along side abhigya.
It is only online fans who are being so ferociously against the new gen/ the new leap and mocking and hating on them, whereas tv audience are happy as long as they keep up the drama quotient in the show. I'm not for side lining anyone and would rather all characters be given something to do, as clearly only abhigya fans online are hating on new gen out of defensiveness for their fave jodi, but when there are people clearly enjoying the new gen and the trp audience have no issue in watching them and aren't exactly switching off their telly out of annoyance for the screen space being given to them, why would writers not give the new gen screen space too or why shouldn't the audience who also like the new gen not get to watch them be an integral part of the story?
People could say abhi is literally just like every other ekta male lead such as raman, and that pragya is just like every other female lead, but here instead people are saying ranbir-prachi are copies of abhi-pragya, when abhi-pragya aren't exactly original either when raman-ishita or even ram and priya from BALH are exactly like abhi-pragya's characterisations/ relationship.
For example, Ishita-raman/ priya-ram both were also exactly the same as abhigya; rich male lead who claims undying love for female lead yet humiliates, accuses and misunderstands her and constantly throws her out of his life but then is justified by writers with his behaviour buy making him do everything he can to make up with the female lead only to treat her the same again in the future, both are polar opposites in terms of personality hence have a lot of nok-jhok and the female lead isn't rich. Same relationships, dynamics and personalities between all the couples. For this reason there is no point in saying one character is a copy of another when no characters on ITV are original and all male-female leads have the same characterisation. Ranbir and prachi are not a copy of abhigya, but are merely stereotypical male-female protagonists like abhigya that exist throughout ITV. Abhigya and their story is exactly like raman-ishita, ram-priya and many other onscreen jodis.
I agree with that. On a general level kkb itself is a recycled plot but it worked because of the leads. Their chemistry is palpable. Thats basically for all of these daily soaps. Rarely do they work because of the plot, it’s generally fr the leads. I agree that Abhi and Pragya’s story has been butchered. The leap itself wasn’t well thought off. It’s like they picked a random number without thinking of logistics. I’m sorry but the plots they are showing with the new gen is more suited to teenagers not 20 year olds. Its one of my biggest pet peeves that their timeline is screwed up. I just think if they wanted to take the new gen forward they should have casted better. The actors simply don’t suit the characters - its cringeworthy. For instance shows like PR or YRKKH or even the older shows like kzk worked post leap because the new generation had chemistry to match and their charcters were different. I get that all leads are recycled but recycling the character sketch in the same show? Personally i’ve legit stopped watching it and im rewatching old episodes and my favourite tracks.
Also personally i think the people watching on tv are mainly watch for Abhi and Pragya too, just waiting for their scenes which the producers are giving out like alms at this point. Like tarsa tarsa ke de rahe hain. Sriti and Shabbir have a very loyal fan following i think and so they’ll continue watching for the small scenes which is why i think the trps aren’t that affected. This is just my opinion though, i could be wrong.
8