Demon's child will be demon only

Demon's child will be demon only i dont understand this theory & i do support vishakha coz on a child first right is of his mother as that child is part of her

Okay,demon's child wouldn't be a demon,then why was hukum so confident that the mother would give birth to andhakasur,Prahlad's father was not sure that he would give birth to a demon and wasn't aware that his wife was a Vishnu devoteeBut here hukum is so confident that this child was going to be born from naagrani,the biggest devotee of lord shiva,and he was going to be andhakasur,so even Vish would be knowing it...Yes,a mother can't kill her own child even if he was born of a rape,but she was damn sure that he is andhakasur and don't agree to abort,that's something fishy

Originally posted by: ImaJain

Okay,demon's child wouldn't be demons child,then why was hukum so confident that the mother would give birth to andhakasur,Prahlad's father was not sure that he would give birth to a demon and wasn't aware that his wife was a Vishnu devoteeBut here hukum is so confident that this child was going to be born from naagrani,the biggest devotee of lord shiva,and he was going to be andhakasur,so even Vish would be knowing it...Yes,a mother can't kill her own child even if he was born of a rape,but she was damn sure that he is andhakasur and don't agree to abort,that's something fishy

And Hukum will let his demon child to be raised by Vishakha?

Deepika demon n rakshas are different ???

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

prahlad's father was himself a demon , so he never had doubt that his son will not be a demon , he was angry when prahlad refuse 2 follow him in wrong path.

Hukum is overconfident person ,who make weird prediction,

In his over confidence only he dint realise its vish not bela

I m not saying anything about d serial , i kept a general view

Is there any guarantee behir's child will be positive only

Every father wishes his son to be like him,but that didn't happen in prahlada's case,but here hukum chose the ultimate risk by choosing naagrani,the biggest devotee of lord shiva to carry his child,that wasn't his wierd prediction,everyone including Vish must be aware of it

Exactly is it necessary for a demon child to be a demon. Alright maybe for the show it will be. But am not talking of the show here, I am talking about in a general sense, imagine if a demon and another being (human/naagin/something else) were to have a child how do we know that demon genes will be dominant in all cases. The child could be like either or both of the parents in physical characteristics and powers. As for personal traits, I believe you don't have them the instance you are born, you grow to have your traits and they change over time, they can be influenced by what you have seen your parents doing, how you see your siblings and friends behave and your own inner thoughts

Originally posted by: deepikagupta9

Demon's child will be demon only i dont understand this theory & i do support vishakha coz on a child first right is of his mother as that child is part of her

We all know about prahlad he 2 was demon by birth but is counted as one of biggest devotee of lord vishnu coz of his deeds

When prahlad's mom use 2 secretly worship lord vishnu when he was in her wOMB , even prahlad was brought up b/w rishi munni till teenage so he already devoted himself 2 lord vishnu despite being a demon .

Its all about upbringing , if a demon child is raised up b/w positivity then he 2 will can be a gud human.

Noone learn evilness from his mother's womb .

Janam se koi bura nhi hota

I support vishaka if she doesn't want 2 kill her child

Originally posted by: Arshukaurkhushi

Deepika demon n rakshas are different ???

Originally posted by: VARUNI2014

Prahlada not child of demon..hiranyakasipa is asura ..not a demon

Hiranyakasipa devotee of Lord Vishnu in his previous birth ..did a small mistake and born as asura