MANIKARNIKA - Krish left for NTR biopic wasn't kicked out - Page 3

Anr in Andhra, manikarnika is being sold as krish's film. I can see many oFmy friends not even knowing kangana directed it.

Originally posted by: Nova19

BTW this is what the writer had to say way back when Kangana first floated through blinds that Krish had deviated from the script and makers were unhappy and there would need to be reshoots:"This is rubbish! The film is not being re-shot. I saw the film recently and I loved it. It has turned out very well, and it will become a blockbuster because the team has put in a lot of blood and sweat into it. The VFX and the performances are superlative. Yes, there are a few portions of the film that are yet to be shot and that patch-work will be completed very soon. The primary shooting of the film is over and there is no re-shooting involved. And yes, Krrish will be completing the portions before heading into his next project, the NTR biopic. He's a thorough professional and we're absolutely arriving on the date we promised January 25, 2019. There is no change in the plan.

Whenever anyone is still working with or has any money at stake with Kangana they always end up saying what she wants them to say eventually. Kangana is letting him write one of her next films and he is now singing her tune. Well kind of, he apparently didn't watch the Masand interview where I thought she claimed they filmed "drama " and added a "woman's touch which I would think isn't action scenes. Guess she hasn't told him to say that yet.

Shh... don't try and make sense here.

Why did she sign it if the script wasnt good or needed female touch , they need to come with a clause with her and the entire team , sign a contract to say any changes happen before shooting , after that no change of script / cast n no inteference if happen we can sue

Now that the movie is about to be released, they're trying to bring in some positivity for it. Bakwaas I say.

Originally posted by: ImagineMe

More like...

Hit = Krish + Kangana (sparingly with a heavy heart)

Flop = Kangana

Oops. Kangana has changed the talking points again. She has been the director since June (so it goes without saying all the early denials were flat out lies). The film was a "sinking ship " when she took over. Fully 70% of the film is her direction. Only some of the action she credits to Krish (kind of ironic given that the writer was saying she was only adding action ;) They will both be credited as directors but "individually " it is not a "collaboration ". Oh and just so we know she mentions they could have replaced all his work.

Originally posted by: Nova19

Oops. Kangana has changed the talking points again. She has been the director since June (so it goes without saying all the early denials were flat out lies). The film was a "sinking ship " when she took over. Fully 70% of the film is her direction. Only some of the action she credits to Krish (kind of ironic given that the writer was saying she was only adding action ;) They will both be credited as directors but "individually " it is not a "collaboration ". Oh and just so we know she mentions they could have replaced all his work.

Now I understand why she was admitting to Masand that she wasn't so good at action and it was such a struggle. If the action isn't very good, she's laying the groundwork for blaming Krish. Still if she's claiming 70% she must think it's good. Now it just remains to be seen whether the changes are good the way her changes to Simran were "good ". I still haven't seen Simran so will have to read the reviews. Wonder if there is money left in the budget to pay for those?

Just release your Darn film and get out of sight.