Posted:
They are both different methods for overcoming our personal bias.
Imagine you are a trial judge and you are bound to render an impartial decision.If you knew one of the parties or,if one was related to you,an impartial decision could not be rendered.This is why judges often recuse themselves from a case.Objectivity requires what I'll call "sharpness of focus ".If one allows extraneous distractions to distort the focus of an objective then you have not exercised all the powers at your disposal,and failed to be objective.
Objectivity is the ability of a person to make judgments about physical matter clearly.
Impartiality is an extension off of objectivity. Objectivity is within impartiality. Taking a further look beyond visible physical matter.
Impartiality is the act of performing great objectivity. Impartial is essentially wholeness or fully complete. To be considered impartial one must have objectivity first. Next, fairness or being equal and balanced upon the situation. Then, out of good intention and awareness of the truth. Not only for the visible physical matter within this situation. But, of the overall good.
Being impartial means you do not have a predisposition to any awnser on the table but may feel you know the right awnser.
Being objective means you do not have any predispositions at all.
