Posted:
Surbhi: She started provoking Sreesnath form the morning and she made fun of his injuries and family. I know Sreesnath also goes in other people's family which is why I do not support him at all.But, Surbhi still does not have the right to comment on his family. She started attacking Dipiak unnecessarily whereas Dipiak did not say a word to her. Surbhi started laughing after she went outside, so that means, she was doing it to make Sreesnath angry and get a reaction out of him. She just wanted to make a mudda so that, her comment about Romil is not discussed in Weekend Ka Waar.
Sreesanth: He was wrong in reacting to the extent that, eh made the 11pm comment. He should had refrained from doing that as he could have said something else. Also, what he said about Jasleen was terrible as he still made fun of her efforts that she made, there is no loyalty form his side which is why I want Jaslene to stay away from him.
Deepak: He was trying to influence everyone against Jaslene that, she should go to jail.He got his karma when his name came up and he was desperate to have Jaslene go to jail even after he went.He wanted to make a mudda of Jasleen beign the sanchalak.I am wanting Salman to clarify that, both sanchalaks did nto come to a mutual agreement, so is both of their fault. He is also being partial by not taking Somi's name, why take one name and not of another.
Karanvir: He did not stop Surbhi, but was quick to react when Jasleen retaliated. He always interrupts when Jaslene is talking, he always wants to made a mudda out of nowhere. Karanvir took Jaslene's comment personally, but what was Surbhi saying to Jasleen,Megha, and Dipika. He never makes her quiet or tells her to stop.He enjoys when she is misbehaving with everyone, but Jaslene has to stay quiet, this is not fair and she did nto even take one person's name. Why did Karanvir not tell Surbhi that, she should not involve Jasleen and other sin her fight, she was calling Jalsene chamchi too when she was explaining something to Sreesanth.
Sreesanth: He was wrong in reacting to the extent that, eh made the 11pm comment. He should had refrained from doing that as he could have said something else. Also, what he said about Jasleen was terrible as he still made fun of her efforts that she made, there is no loyalty form his side which is why I want Jaslene to stay away from him.
Deepak: He was trying to influence everyone against Jaslene that, she should go to jail.He got his karma when his name came up and he was desperate to have Jaslene go to jail even after he went.He wanted to make a mudda of Jasleen beign the sanchalak.I am wanting Salman to clarify that, both sanchalaks did nto come to a mutual agreement, so is both of their fault. He is also being partial by not taking Somi's name, why take one name and not of another.
Karanvir: He did not stop Surbhi, but was quick to react when Jasleen retaliated. He always interrupts when Jaslene is talking, he always wants to made a mudda out of nowhere. Karanvir took Jaslene's comment personally, but what was Surbhi saying to Jasleen,Megha, and Dipika. He never makes her quiet or tells her to stop.He enjoys when she is misbehaving with everyone, but Jaslene has to stay quiet, this is not fair and she did nto even take one person's name. Why did Karanvir not tell Surbhi that, she should not involve Jasleen and other sin her fight, she was calling Jalsene chamchi too when she was explaining something to Sreesanth.