Today's episode was - Don't touch

abhilasha_dream

@abhilasha_dream

Rocker

29

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#1

Surbhi accused Romil of ghuring her and she feeling uncomfortable due to it.

And Dipika's - Don't touch me.

In one case I am with the victim and the other with the culprit.

Romil had stared at Surbhi earlier or not and whether he was warned or not I can say atleast this much that today's accusation was put in frustration and it wasn't real.

Surbhi did cross her line today. She pointed at Romil's character and I hope Salman takes hee class.

On the other hand , although Dipak did not touch Dipika intentionally but he had got a pre-warning from her before she blasted him.

And I agree with Dipika, when someone touches you regularly while they are talking , it is irritating and once you have warned the person, they need to keep their habit in check when in conversation with you however serious the discussion is.

33

Reply

Quote

Ashish

@PappuFeku

Beginner

0

Posted: 7 years ago

#2

What can be expected from Deepak and Surbhi 😡😡

12

Reply

Quote

TheBoss

@TheBoss

Stunner

35

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#3

I agree. If she doesn't want him to touch her then he shouldn't and she is within her right to define her comfort level against each individual.

14

Reply

Quote

panacea

@panacea

Voyager

19

Posted: 7 years ago

#4

I enjoyed the gangster brother who airdropped to save his sister and as usual the threats.

6

Reply

Quote

MOHIT

@MT_loverboy

Rocker

28

+ 6

Posted: 7 years ago

#5

Ok you are saying exactly same circumstances, even in second noone crossed line , yet dipika wala is real??

Noo if you are saying one fake, then it shud be both

If it counts, i would still lean on surbhi wala being more real . She warned him many times. If not, then when she came to romil and said this, he must have retaliated .

Not saying dipika wala wasnt real. But it just didnt made much sense to me .

But its ok. Its her call. Not judging .

Edited by MT_loverboy - 7 years ago

2

Reply

Quote

surbhi tyagi

@EtherealRati

Trailblazer

41

+ 5

Posted: 7 years ago

#6

In my openion...if deepak was wrong than so was romil. If deepak had no intentions, romil ki bhi nahi thi. But if deepika can feel irritated with him just to make his point ...then even surbhi irritation on romil's continous ghoorna is not wrong. Ya toh dono galat...ya dono sahi.

Reply

Quote

Anmol Jain

@intruderfast

Trailblazer

40

+ 4

Posted: 7 years ago

#7

Dipak shld understand it clearly that no girl in the house is comfortable near him.

No girl except rana sits besides him . uske intentions wo jaane , but the girls have valid reasons to not go near him. Uski harkatein aisi rahi hai ki koi ladki comfortable nahi hai.

Respect someone personal space.

Reg surbhi, if she feels so she shld talk to Romil directly and clear it up. But u cannot without prrof accuse someone to such degree

20

Reply

Quote

abhilasha_dream

@abhilasha_dream

Rocker

29

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#8

Originally posted by: MT_loverboy
Ok you are saying exactly same circumstances, even in second noone crossed line , yet dipika wala is real??
Noo if you are saying one fake, then it shud be both

If it counts, i would still lean on surbhi wala being more real . She warned him many times. If not, then when she came to romil and said this, he must have retaliated .
Not saying dipika wala wasnt real. But it just didnt made much sense to me .
But its ok. Its her call. Not judging .

I am not denying the fact that Romil must have got this forewarning from Surbhi earlier too but today the time and the way she put it was wrong.

If you look at Dipika's case there also I had mentioned that Deepak did not touch her wrongly, and Dipika also agreed to it.

Here also Romil must be staring at Surbhi without bad intentions but the way she put it was as if Romil had some bad eye on her - that was wrong.

If she just wouldn't have added that line - " Dekho Romil Chaudhary apni behen ko ghoorta hai" . I would have been with her but she added it after stop staring that was character assassination.

2

Reply

Quote

Sandysprings

@Sandysprings

Dazzler

24

Posted: 7 years ago

#9

Originally posted by: EtherealRati
In my openion...if deepak was wrong than so was romil. If deepak had no intentions, romil ki bhi nahi thi. But if deepika can feel irritated with him just to make his point ...then even surbhi irritation on romil's continous ghoorna is not wrong. Ya toh dono galat...ya dono sahi.

Both r different things ..why r u comparing it ??

4

Reply

Quote

abhilasha_dream

@abhilasha_dream

Rocker

29

+ 2

Posted: 7 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: EtherealRati
In my openion...if deepak was wrong than so was romil. If deepak had no intentions, romil ki bhi nahi thi. But if deepika can feel irritated with him just to make his point ...then even surbhi irritation on romil's continous ghoorna is not wrong. Ya toh dono galat...ya dono sahi.

Surbhi's irritation is justified but not the sentence - "Dekho Romil Chaudhary apni behen ko ghoor raha hai "

This sentence was character assassination and one can't support her for that.

One needs to know how to put things across properly otherwise you will only look bad even if you are right.

6

Reply

Quote