Understanding Logic of Vish

Alwayssmile1 thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#1
Hello everyone
Watching this season since starting and loving Bela and Mahir.
Anita as Vishaka is great.😊

Now coming to logic of Vish for becoming Naagrani

She is thinking that she will frame Bela for the murder of innocent person so that her crown will be lost and she will become Naagrani.

Now let me guess she herself have killed innocent person Ajitabh so how can she become Naagrani
means before you become Naagrani you can kill any innocent person🤔.??

Please share your views and do tell more such illogical scenarios😊

Edited by Alwayssmile1 - 7 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

1.2k

Users

5

Likes

16

Frequent Posters

nuomi.riceball thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#2
I think that is the logic otherwise Vikrant who had killed several innocents too will not be able to become the Naagraj.
415868 thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#3

Hey welcome!

Many here expressed the same doubt in the past.

I think once a person is in the power and position of king then they are not supposed to abuse the power. That responsibility and scrutiny of actions comes only after they assume the title of Naagrani/Naagraj.


maharathikarna thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: crusty


Hey welcome!

Many here expressed the same doubt in the past.

I think once a person is in the power and position of king then they are not supposed to abuse the power. That responsibility and scrutiny of actions comes only after they assume the title of Naagrani/Naagraj.



I was going to type this only. Then i saw it was already typed😆
nuomi.riceball thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#5
In this season Naag Naagin it seems only Bella has sense of righteousness and justice. She doesn't want to kill any innocent or those falsely accused from the beginning. Vikrant kills anybody who is in his ways no matter who that person is. Vishaka was blinded from the beginning by her love towards Vikrant that she was ready to kill anybody and everybody whom she thought to be involved in Vikrant's death. That too including Anu, Pratham and Bulthu whom she thought was also Vikrant's murderers, and was ready to accept Mahir who pulled the trigger on Vikrant without investigating further. Bella didn't want to kill anybody who was not involved even a dog. Even when she believed that Mahir was the killer of Vikrant and was trying to kill Mahir, her heart is telling her that this guy is innocent and not Vikrant's killer.
Maria.Jewel thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 7 years ago
#6
Maybe she loves Vikrant more than the naagmani and now that she is married to him, naagmani isn't that big a concern for her?

Also woh sab choro i still can't understand why was she remembering her moments with Ajitabh when she was supposedly dying. She still loves Vikrant, more than ever then Vikrant then why think about Ajitabh?😆



nuomi.riceball thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 7 years ago
#7
There is incoherence with the story every since Vikrant's track was introduced.

When Vikrant had just newly returned to the show and was disguised as Yuvraaj. He went to the Haveli to pray to Shivji and said that he will be looking for revenge from the boys who had hurt him. Then, it was shown a couple episodes later that he was the one who planned everything. So that Ruhi would be assaulted and molested by those boys and made it seems like he was killed by them. So that Ruhi would come back to avenge his death hoping that Ruhi would kill an innocent in the process that will make her lose her powers and throne as Naagrani.

On one episode they say something then showing an entire different thing on the next episode. When Anu was killed Vikrant and Bella said that both of them did not kill Anu. Vikrant even said in front of Bella that he did not kill Anu and he did not have any reasons to kill Anu. When they got to the Haveli and met with the purple snake even Vikrant was asking the purple snake whether she was the one who killed Anu. She told him that she did not kill anybody and then asked her then who killed Anu. Then a couple episodes later it was revealed that the one who killed Anu was actually the purple snake and Vikrant.

Then there was this one episode where Vikrant explained to Vishaka that a Naagin is not supposed to bite another Naagin in their atma roop. When Vishaka did that there was this only one way and that was death. Then she came back alive and was saved without explanation.

The list of inconsistencies and incoherence in the story just keeps on adding and adding. It is a headache to even keep track of what story and details they will keep on changing.




Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".