Why such assumtions

Why is everybody hell bent on assuming that Vikrant is negative. They have not shown anything yet that shows that he is negative in fact he is shown like a true lover who is willing to let go of his love because she loves someone else. Also till shown otherwise Bela and Vikrant were in love with each other for 100 years but a lot of people behave like there was never any love, for sailing the BeHir ship you can't just say there was not any love between them they did last 100 years .

Heya
Not shown anything negative ? All this time when Adi has been giving Bela a tough time hasn't he said many times your enemies are very powerful /dangerous I'm with them etc ? Who is Adi working for ? Vikrant right ? So vikrant is the enemy right toh why will he be positive ? 😆

Also true love I feel it's subjective I would say true love is unconditional and selfless but in Vikrants case even if we ignore everything about him actually being negative his love does have a selfish element which is obtaining the naagmani, had he not been malicious should he not have told Bela about this intention of his ?

I don't think Behir ship needs any help with sailing 😉certainly not with bela vik ship sinking 😛 I guess you find more fans for Bela Mahir not just because how the characters are written and the dynamics of the relationship but also because for so many months we have as viewers seen their relationship develop the love budding and all whereas vik and ruhi were shown for two episodes dancing and of course vik died (only to come back after 9 months to tell his true love that he is alive itni der mein toh bacha paida hojata hai 😆 )

I agree that Vikrant upto now hasn't been shown as negative yet. But the way it's going we are assuming that. However I do agree that even though Mahir is Bela true love, soulmate; whatever happened between Vikrant and Bela can't be forgotten. At least from Bela side when she was ruhi; her love for Vikrant was passionate as shown in episode 1. Vikrant seemed to show the same passion as well. But what many are saying in the forum is there is something more to Vikrant that meets the eye.

Originally posted by: vishaka29

Why is everybody hell bent on assuming that Vikrant is negative. They have not shown anything yet that shows that he is negative in fact he is shown like a true lover who is willing to let go of his love because she loves someone else. Also till shown otherwise Bela and Vikrant were in love with each other for 100 years but a lot of people behave like there was never any love, for sailing the BeHir ship you can't just say there was not any love between them they did last 100 years .

Also let me add that I am shipping no one however it's clear to me that Vikrant is negative because of the clues and the track this character is heading down. Mahir and Bela are the true couple of the show and pair. People only saw a glimpse of Vikrant and Bela in episode 1. If writers would have shown flashbacks it would have been nice. I can't say that Vikrant didn't love Bela. But if you ask me my honest opinion I would say Vikrant isn't what he seems and he is hiding a lot of things from Bela. It hasn't been shown yet but I believe he did love her in his own way but at the same time he is using her for the naagmani. He wants the naagmani more.

So far vikrant character has been shown suspicion

He lied to bela about where he is from like naaglok

Teaming up with Adi who actually shot him

Waited months to come find bela

Wants naagmani for his mom so she could become powerful

He grabbed her firmly and when bela said she is hurting. Vikrant was like good bc now you are feeling what I am feeling. He want her to be in pain like he is. This is not love!! Even bela said Mahir would never do that no matter how much he is hurt by her. Now that's love!!

These are few reasons why everyone is assuming vikrant to be negative!!

Welcome to naagin forum!

Thank you Dhami , Durga and Komlika for your comments . I can see where you all are coming from and it is logical I agree but I still feel we can't completly pre decide that he is out and out negative as like with Vish they may have grey shades but to paint vikrant as an out and out villain and assume his love for Bela was never existent I feel is wrong too. Who is to know who vibrant will choose between bela and naagmani if given the choice . For the endless possibilities he could choose bela I'm not saying he will but it's not evident yet he won't either .

To the ever so smart member who decided to make conclusions and assumptions about me just by one post congratulations hope you are feeling better about being a IF stunnerz 👏 And FYI yes I'm an oldie actually joined IF in the same year as yourself but stopped using it after 2 years and now I did not remember my password nor did I have access to the ancient email associated with my account to request a new password hence a new account . How ironic this post was about assumptions and see what you did ⭐️ 😊

Originally posted by: vishaka29

Why is everybody hell bent on assuming that Vikrant is negative. They have not shown anything yet that shows that he is negative in fact he is shown like a true lover who is willing to let go of his love because she loves someone else. Also till shown otherwise Bela and Vikrant were in love with each other for 100 years but a lot of people behave like there was never any love, for sailing the BeHir ship you can't just say there was not any love between them they did last 100 years .

Well, he hid the truth about his clan so that Ruhi would love him.

@Vishaka... just leave luv aside, vikki main motive is naagmani,