🏏 IPL 2026: Match 3, RR vs CSK at Guwahati 🏏
🏏 IPL 2026: Match 4, PBKS vs GT at New Chandigarh🏏
EK DIL & EK JAAN 30.3
Newyork (2009)..Did the movie humanize terrorists?
Coming Soon - Rama Official Teaser - Ramayana
NAACH-GAANA 31.3
Who saved Yaman-The dragon
Originally posted by: abhilasha_dream
The whole episode was a time pass specially that Roshini scene.
Mrs. Bhalla screamed for no reason on Mrs. Madhavi as it would have been totally Roshini's fault if she would have got stabbed.That whole scene looked useless and forced to give some screenspace to Rossini.Ishita fighting for Raman was good but it became too lengthy. It could have been easily cut short.Secondly, how she knew Prashants, NGO's husband was fine but how did she get to know that Prashanth was an NGO workers husband and that too of that NGO worker who had gone to Raman's office was still a mystery.Tanya's fizz left the moment NGO workers left.As I said, 2 simple question and her game would be over :1) What type of Justice she wanted - imprisonment or marriage or just mere insult ? Coz for imprisonment one requires police where she is not going , so only options left are marriage and insult.2) Why is she making such a hullabaloo when the video made in the phone is with her and Raman has not even seen it. How did her life get ruined when the video has not been seen by anybody ?
I can't really understand bhalla seniors and mihika today isn't wat ishita told today is wat she was explaining dem d before day questioning Tanya tab toh kisiko kuch sunayi nahi de raha tha they were all blaming Raman saying he did dat and all aaj Aisa achanak kya hogaya dat they are trusting Raman and are feeling sorry to even doubt him ??
Well I like ishita points & her speech was nice woman & men should be equals men can be victim too not only woman
Simmi param first time did wonderful job fixed Raman in Tanya Kannada than proved him innocents from world simmi param need to set backstage