Why Siddharth Sir Choosed Sony ?

First Previous

Page

Frequent Posters

rose1000

@rose1000

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#11

I am glad its on Sony. SP shows are utterly regressive and SP won't let any show remain on air that is good content and for the classes. SP channel is for the masses. All they know is TRP.

Quote

loveispure

@loveispure

Dazzler

Posted: 8 years ago

#12

I am glad that it is airing on sony.if it has been on sp then it would have been butchered.what star did to amla and chandragupta maurya.I think my favourite historical figure was reduced to aym love sick damad to suit saas bahu sazish content of star and Turkish adaptation amla content was changed and pulled off because of trp.my favourite show made senseless and driving according to trp.

Sony atleast don't pressure show to change its content.and whatever show came on Sony stick to its content most of time not driven by trp.first channel to provide a show on grey female in behadd.

People wanted positive ending for female antagonist but show stick to original content.if it had been aired on star then she would has become ideal bahu and bibi.

So I think it is best that show is airing on sony atleast show makers will show what they want not channel.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

halfbloodprince

@WindsOfHeaven

Achiever

+ 8

Posted: 8 years ago

#13

I'm happy that Porus being aired on Sony. Regardless of the producer's personal ambitions, I'm kinda assured of the channel's non-interference in the show's content. I still can't forget how SP reduced someone like Chandragupta Maurya to a fictional wife's puppy. I don't even have words to describe what a regressive shit the channel is.

Moreover, I hope the producer doesn't modify Porus like he modified Starbharata.

Quote

1 2

Siddharth

Why Siddharth Sir Choosed Sony ? - Page 2

Related Topics

Explore Topics