Hi,
I am Ibby. During Diya Aur Bati Hum days I had once written a post something that went along the lines you have written in your post today. Whatever I am about to write is purely a view from a philosophical standpoint. You see, you have an image of Diya Aur Baati because you have watched an entire series; something which was created over a long period of time. If you think about it, during the early days of Sandhya and Suraj's marriage, it was rarely Diya Aur Bati for them, since Sandhya's heart was not in it and Diya Aur Bati is made up of two elements and it is only when they jointly perform beautiful acts are they said to be such a thing. Right?
As some people have identified this already, the story for Uma and Kanak isn't primarily about being exactly the same Diya Aur Bati/like Suraj and Sandhya, but it's about having that sort of qualities and ideas - not all lamps look the same, since they can be created innovatively and differently by each of us, but at the end it's about the light it produces? Right? It is this adoption of a bigger notion, which is your ultimate conception of Diya Aur Bati, has been used to create that sort of goals for characters like Uma and Kanak. The verbs diya aur bati in the title song comes only after it has been sung 'tu sooraj mein sanjh piya ji' - in this diya aur bati is another example of the title, another way to phrase and illustrate two characters. This show is about perspectives, how two different characters live together. Whereas Diya Aur Bati Hum was about a supportive husband. Even though the show had predominantly shown the development of Sandhya's character as an IPS, a wife, a daughter-in-law, a mother and so on, it was only due to her supportive and wonderful husband. Suraj was truly the foundation of such a concept - his masculinity did not stop him from allowing his feminine wife to pursue her dreams. In TSMSP, it is about a wife supporting her husband to become what he is capable of but does not yet realise it since he has been blindfolded by an alternative reality. This is how I see it so far and you're all of course welcome to refute such assumptions.
Furthermore, and I am uncertain whether many of us here have heard of such thoughts, there is a maxim which derives from a branch of philosophical position called Existentialism: existence preceded essences. It is precisely a claim that argues that before we can have any meanings of absolutely anything at all, we must experience it. Thus our existence must precede essence. Think about it, for us to be a doctor, a lawyer, a teacher we must first exist over time, learn and practice these roles - it is only after do we become such things. Similarly, for Uma and Kanak to be Diya Aur Bati like Suraj and Sandhya, it must happen as they grow as characters over time. We do not become a lover or a hater over night, it is a timely process just as most things in our world is. For us to understand people, we have to get to know them. Yes, we intuitively feel connected to some people but our intuitions can be wrong and it is then only in experience do we come to distinguish things. Moreover, it is only when things go right and wrong, do we come to understand what is right and what is not. So, it is only after circumstances has taken place is it likely the two characters will come to realise what they mean for each other.
Before I see this show about two lovers and their journey, I see the show about perspectives. As the title itself speaks volume and we must not forget, Suraj and Sanjh is not distinct in nature but the same act, it is only our perspective which sees it differently since we perceive it at different times of our day but it doesn't change the act of nature itself.
Finally, Kanak is the feminist I admire. At the moment, even though she would appreciate Uma's help; the truth is she does not need it, since she alone is enough to stand up and bring herself justice, as we can see that she is. And if the question is about women empowerment, then it is likely women are more likely to be empowered by a woman standing up all by herself than a man beside her.
All I can say is have patience, allow the characters to grow and try not to expect the same as Diya Aur Bati, as that was an authentic piece in-itself and it cannot be replicated ever again - at least, not for me. And it is only when we expect and hope, do we come to find ourselves disappointed. Keep your mind open and see this characters without in comparison to others and you'll see the originality in themselves.
Love,
Ibby
Edited by -Imu.M- - 7 years ago