Do you agree with this statement of Kangana's on adultery? - Page 5

They're both at fault. Period.

As long as she admits that she is a morally corrupt person who doesn't care whose life she is destroying as long as she can benefit from it, I agree with her. Its not her responsibility to think about another family. It was the husband's responsibility as he had made the commitment not her.She had no obligations to anyone. But that person is also known as a selfish and self-centred person who doesn't care about the right and wrong as long as she is winning. She cannot pretend to be a saint and keep doing things knowingly, that eventually hurt others.

Originally posted by: cricketfan1

*sorry I am seeing this only now*

Starting off your comment you said 90% fault is of the man...I want to know how you arrived at the exact %ages?😕If at all its 100%-100%, no less no more...

Anyways, I think you can still give your POV without hijacking the post into a man Vs woman and who has how much percentage of fault...Because mind you, its not just women who indulge with married men, the other way round is very much prevalent too...

Seems like you have a problem with my use of percentages. Please tell me where I have written that I came up with the exact percentage?? I just used a mathematical term to explain more accurately who is at more fault. I hope you and everyone here know very well that something like "fault" can't be calculated.
I wrote 90% that doesn't makes it a fact, that's why I wrote "I think" before it.

When did I made it man vs woman?? Huh??
Kangana was talking about an affair between "single women and married men". I gave my answer on those terms. If it had been other way round, I would've said the same thing, just by reversing the genders.

But whatever, I don't think you need to dictate people what they should write and what not. If you had so much problem with my post, you should've just pushed the report button. But well, using percentages is not against forum rules I guess.

Originally posted by: aaditi123

Technically she's right, the other woman owes no loyalty to the first, she hasn't taken any vows or is breaking them.
But morally, she couldn't be more wrong. You can't build a house on a foundation like that.

Originally posted by: cougarTown

single women who get involved with married men are not at fault..it is the men who are commited and break the commitment by sleeping around

In adultery I think its more of a fault of anyone who is committed to stray and have an affair. So yes a husband is more of a home wrecker than the other party. But the other party be it a man or woman is not absolved of fault. Its a morally bankrupt thing to do. And you can't cry over commitment, faithfulness etc. Like Kiran Rao can't cry over Aamir falling for Dangal girl.

Definitely don't agree...how is cheating on your spouse right? N how is being single the excuse to absolve yourself if been bg responsible for breaking someone else's home...is this how they justify their wrongdoings in their mind? Call it love n and sleep peacefully?! Smh

My 2 cents: cheating in a relationship, be it marriage , engagement or companionship is a crime ,.