Posted:
no no i didnt took u wrong .i was just giving explanation as i know how difficult they all shoot this shaadi seq with heavy rains n strike going on .but what u said is totally correct they could have mention shikha is gone doing something .these minute details adds so much or may be they have something up for her in later epi to show why she was gayab .need to waitOriginally posted by: Saltnpeppa
Thank you, SonaThere are celebs coming in IB & YRK wedding too? SP must be rolling in gold if they are splurging on celebs😃.. I think you got me wrong Sona, I was just thinking instead of just using Mika as a filler - they could have used Rupesh Kataria's comic timing and Barun's "Bromance"with him to further the story.. there would have been continuity and flow of story instead of the short breaks of Mika...Whether Ketki was available or not is not something a viewing Janata will bother about..What they will see is the flow of story? They will be thinking, that PP guy went out with the girl and now she is not seen - what happened to her? - continuity is one of the fundamental principles of direction. You can stop an ongoing track and jump to another track but when you comeback to prev track, it has to continue from where it left off ... and for me the absence of Ketki is glaring..Ohh, Yes though I guess I will have to watch it covering my eyes partially with a cushion or pillow, can't watch Advay get beaten up
Cricket
Current Affairs
Shiv Shakti
Ye Hai Mohabbatein
