@Sabita, I had already written down how I perceive Chamundi in Ayesha's thread last weekend. As per my perception, it is wrong for the Empress of a civilization to give in to her emotions, whims & fancies, without any consideration regarding what might be the possible outcomes. Personal emotions, wishes take a backseat for the person who wears the crown and the throne demands for ultimate sacrifices. Chamundi had miserably failed, while her daughter resoundingly succeeded.Now coming to Sambhabija. She is definitely the antagonist. I felt appalled w.r.t. her actions regarding snatching someone else's husband and talks regarding male infanticide & male folks. But apart from that bit, I personally don't find it is wrong being ruthless in her single aim to retrieve the lost glory of her civilization. One has to be ruthless in case she/he wants to expand the kingdom by any means. There is no place for benignity, altruism, benevolence, magnanimity, mercy/clemency & soft-hearted individuals in that sphere. It is a bitter truth and Sambhabija precisely wants that.
Regarding infanticide & disparaging the other gender, my 21st century mind is thinking & talking. But a 3000 BC human, from either a matriarchal or patriarchal society, surrounded by enemies who are ever ready pounce, war and usurp one's kingdom would have only thought about the survival and would have always preferred for the fittest one depending on the perception. The horror is people still do that in the name of survival of family name and wrong notions...
Apologies, if I have hurt anyone. But again my perception only.
Edited by chandrima02 - 8 years ago