Posted:
I concur with your points, but I don't mind her characterization. She is who she is supposed to be in the setting of the story and her world. There were tough times back then. Societies revolved around surviving. If Dravids had such bad laws, it's because they used to work for them. Let's just remember about the Spartan society. They killed the children who were born with health problems. Today this is the ultimate cruelty, but back then they made this rule because having a city with too many people who were not able to fight or work was slowing them down. For a time it worked, only later it didn't... Too much rigidity led to their downfall.
I am reading "Alcibiades" by Plato and there, in one of the dialogues, Alcibiades tells to Socrates that there is nothing worse for a man than to be seen as a coward... He would rather lose everything -life, fortune- but courage...
Back in those times, courage and honor were everything... And Devsena's father lost both, there on the battlefield. The Aryan warrior proved more courage than him as he defeated him. The honor was gone as well because, his whole lifetime, he would have had to live knowing that he had to be grateful to his enemy's mercy. It may not make sense to us today, but then this was worse than death for a man. The Dravids condemned him... they had to mark him as an example, so their other soldiers learn to fight to their last breath and not rely on their enemy's mercy. The details like the fact that Devsena's father was unconscious and there wasn't his fault that the Aryan let him live were not important... That's how hard those times were.
Merely, I doubt that they will portray Aryans as being morally superior till the very end. If they present the Aryan Invasion Theory then they must likewise show that once they conquered the land they introduced discrimination in order to establish their authority, especially the one regarding the color of the skin.
I am reading "Alcibiades" by Plato and there, in one of the dialogues, Alcibiades tells to Socrates that there is nothing worse for a man than to be seen as a coward... He would rather lose everything -life, fortune- but courage...
Back in those times, courage and honor were everything... And Devsena's father lost both, there on the battlefield. The Aryan warrior proved more courage than him as he defeated him. The honor was gone as well because, his whole lifetime, he would have had to live knowing that he had to be grateful to his enemy's mercy. It may not make sense to us today, but then this was worse than death for a man. The Dravids condemned him... they had to mark him as an example, so their other soldiers learn to fight to their last breath and not rely on their enemy's mercy. The details like the fact that Devsena's father was unconscious and there wasn't his fault that the Aryan let him live were not important... That's how hard those times were.
Merely, I doubt that they will portray Aryans as being morally superior till the very end. If they present the Aryan Invasion Theory then they must likewise show that once they conquered the land they introduced discrimination in order to establish their authority, especially the one regarding the color of the skin.
comment:
p_commentcount